His grand vision remains to leave Mastodon users in control of the social network, making their own decisions about what content is allowed or what appears in their timelines.

I don’t use Mastadon cause I don’t care for micro-blogging, but nevertheless, I like this.

  • vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    His grand vision remains to leave Mastodon users in control of the social network, making their own decisions about what content is allowed or what appears in their timelines.

    So uh… Mastodon will not have a moderation team?

    I mean this makes sense, but how exactly is after-stopping-moderation Meta different then?

    • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Do you think Eugen has been personally moderating all Mastodon instances up until now?

      He hasn’t. Obviously the moderation system has nothing to do with what is being discussed here.

      • vga@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Interesting way to be wrong. While thinking you’re being correct.

        • umean2me@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          I think you know what they meant. “Mastodon” is not a platform, it is essentially a protocol. You cannot have a moderation team for Mastodon by design. The individual instances of Mastodon CAN have moderation and many of them do. That’s why you pick an instance to register an account under instead of going to “mastodon.com” and signing up on the front page.

          The article and move isn’t about moderation of the content, it’s about development of the platform itself.