• 0ops@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Shoes still produce way less tire pollution than bicycles

    Do you have a source for that? Because that doesn’t match my experience at all, especially if we measure by wear per mile. Plus, shoes are a lot more finicky than bike tires. If they’re not a good fit or if the wearer has bad walking habits, they’ll wear out prematurely and end up in a landfill with a lot of rubber left. I tend to wear out the balls of my feet, for example. To do the same with a bike tire you’d have to be downright abusive, locking brakes on pavement and stuff

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      especially if we measure by wear per mile.

      If now you’re moving the goalposts to “wear per mile” then car tires win substantially over bicycle tires.

      According to this source bicycle tires should be replaced after about 4,000 miles. source

      Whereas according to this source an average car tire should last 50,000 miles source

      The argument against bicycles vs cars, using tire wear as the metric, gets even worse when you introduce the cost of tires in bicycle vs car. You get many MANY more miles per tire per dollar on a car than you do on a bicycle.

      I understand all the flaws in this comparison, but this is the metric which you introduced to be the problem to solve for.