Gork@lemm.ee to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoMildly McInfuriatingfiles.catbox.moeimagemessage-square125fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageMildly McInfuriatingfiles.catbox.moeGork@lemm.ee to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square125fedilink
minus-squareMoobythegoldensock@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoThey’re not. The $3 bar is not 3x the height of the $1 bar next to it. The $2.99 bar on the right is higher than the $2.99 bar on the left. Someone just free drew the bars and it’s extremely noticeable and annoying.
minus-squarejaybone@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoI think they scaled them in proportion to their group. Remove one entire group (e.g. 2014) and I think you will see it.
minus-squareMoobythegoldensock@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoNot sure what you mean. The McChicken bars are not showing a 200% increase regardless of how you slice it.
minus-squaremeowMix2525@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoThey borked their graph to make room for the picture of the girl for some reason
They’re not. The $3 bar is not 3x the height of the $1 bar next to it. The $2.99 bar on the right is higher than the $2.99 bar on the left. Someone just free drew the bars and it’s extremely noticeable and annoying.
I think they scaled them in proportion to their group.
Remove one entire group (e.g. 2014) and I think you will see it.
Not sure what you mean. The McChicken bars are not showing a 200% increase regardless of how you slice it.
They borked their graph to make room for the picture of the girl for some reason