HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Science@beehaw.orgEnglish · 6 months agoLet em looselemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageLet em looselemmy.dbzer0.comHootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Science@beehaw.orgEnglish · 6 months agomessage-square18fedilink
minus-squareranandtoldthat@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 months agoPeer review is false security, so much bad and fraudulent science gets through, but due to the stamp of authority people are less skeptical. Additionally it’s harder to publish good science. There’s a lot of people who understand this better than me who can explain it. Here’s one starting point. https://www.experimental-history.com/p/the-rise-and-fall-of-peer-review
Peer review is false security, so much bad and fraudulent science gets through, but due to the stamp of authority people are less skeptical. Additionally it’s harder to publish good science.
There’s a lot of people who understand this better than me who can explain it. Here’s one starting point. https://www.experimental-history.com/p/the-rise-and-fall-of-peer-review