• Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      Do you want to make a statement on what policies the admins should enforce here?

      What’s the argument for/against dealing with it and what should we do?

      If it’s a good argument, I can promise it’ll be seen.

      • 🔍🦘🛎@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        Removal of misinformation should require a mod discussion/panel review. Sources can be deemed to be misinformation by a mod majority vote and the list they maintain should be public.

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          How many mods are there over there, one? Also that’s mod policy. I’m talking about admins. What kind of policy do you want the admins to enforce on the mods?

          • 🔍🦘🛎@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            13 days ago

            Ah, gotcha.

            Well, if mod actions are reported to admins, they already do a review on the mod, I imagine. So in this case, this post should lead to a mod review, right? Not sure if OP had already gone through official channels. I personally haven’t had to look into this topic before.

            So I guess, if admins see that a mod is removing factual information to fit their agenda, that should be grounds for removal. Wikipedia has robust moderation and certainly couldn’t be considered misinformation.