Zen@biglemmowski.win to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 year agoHow bad are search results? Let's compare Google, Bing, Marginalia, Kagi, Mwmbl, and ChatGPTdanluu.comexternal-linkmessage-square49fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10file-textcross-posted to: technology@beehaw.org
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkHow bad are search results? Let's compare Google, Bing, Marginalia, Kagi, Mwmbl, and ChatGPTdanluu.comZen@biglemmowski.win to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 year agomessage-square49fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: technology@beehaw.org
I find it pretty interesting that kagi is rated as Terrible search engine, even ChatGPT preforms better.
minus-squarecyruseuros@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoIdk, doing this “properly” would take an immense amount of effort and manpower. This feels more like a “let me get enough info for an educated guess” EDA process, which still seems to have taken a lot of effort and I appreciate it a lot.
minus-squareakrot@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoBut basing a recommendation on a ballpark anectdotal evidence is eidiculous.
Idk, doing this “properly” would take an immense amount of effort and manpower. This feels more like a “let me get enough info for an educated guess” EDA process, which still seems to have taken a lot of effort and I appreciate it a lot.
But basing a recommendation on a ballpark anectdotal evidence is eidiculous.