Can’t be racist if you get rid of all the brown people taps forehead

  • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.todayOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    That is if we are talking abolish and keep abolished in all territories controlled.

    Ah yes, if we pick and choose our definitions, we can get pretty much any outcome we want, can’t we.

    Haiti didn’t abolish slavery as much as revolt against it (by killing all the slave owners), and they didn’t even manage to keep it abolished for very long, as it’s currently one of the worst countries on earth with regards to child slavery.

    Is that really the hero you want to choose?

      • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.todayOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        I suppose that once again depends on definitions. There’s likely a reason people often use the term “wage slavery” these days even though on paper, salaried workers are by no means slaves, since they can quit whenever they want to, but that doesn’t mean that in practice, people don’t end up in situations that feel like slavery anyways.

        Debt slavery is another one that gets thrown around, even though the possibility of declaring bankruptcy and thus getting off the hook for only a fraction of what you owe is technically available. It almost seems as if slavery is part of the human condition, and if not externally imposed, people will find a way to self-impose it in one way or another.

        Either way, it seems silly to suggest that only the slavery imposed by one particular group of people on one particular group of other people is morally objectionable, and I’m also not entirely convinced that erasing any reminders of it does anything at all to right that wrong. At some point, it must be possible to look back at the past and say “well, that was awful, but at least we’re over it now”, but that isn’t possible if you erase any and all traces of it, is it?