Hello everyone,

I recently came across an article on TorrentFreak about the BitTorrent protocol and found myself wondering if it has remained relevant in today’s digital landscape. Given the rapid advancements in technology, I was curious to know if BitTorrent has been surpassed by a more efficient protocol, or if it continues to hold its ground (like I2P?).

Thank you for your insights!

  • pedroapero@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    It is not anonymous and suffers network fragmentation. Yet the force of Bittorrent is its large community and mature performant tooling (compared to IPFS).

  • ComradeMiao@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    Also your article just says streaming and cloud services are more popular with the masses. Where does it say torrenting is replaced by another piracy method

  • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    Torrenting is a decentralized approach and the corpo parasite hates because there is nothing they can do about it, short of shutting down the internet lol

    Get fuck Disney

  • gila@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    There are things like torrentio now which lend BitTorrent piracy a more integrated UX, and that has definitely extended the lifespan of its usefulness to me. Torrents rarely max out my line speed these days, mostly because I have 1000X the bandwidth compared to when I first started torrenting 20 odd years ago. But it’s still one of the fastest and simplest methods to get any file you want, so I think it’s relevant

  • ComradeMiao@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    Most piracy is either two ancient methods that work perfectly of Usenet or BitTorrent. There is nothing wrong with these methods.

    • Որբունի@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      Usenet has many things wrong with it, NNTP is not at all designed for distributing large files, it’s for propagating messages across servers. File integrity checks have to be tacked on for instance, and the few servers still serving binaries are commercial services that are vulnerable to copyright trolls.

    • finley@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      Considering that USENET goes back to the 70s, and bittorrent was invented in 2001, one of these things is clearly ancient and the other isn’t.

  • melroy@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    Yes it’s very much alive and very important. A lot of industries (like their products: books, movies but also games) are getting restricted, taken away, taking down and removed from other platforms. Old ROM sites are taken down. And platforms like archive.org need to remove all their books.

    The problem is, that there is nobody archiving anymore… because it’s not allowed due to “copyright infringement”. In the end, all these products like books, movies and (old) games might be gone forever. Next generations will not be able to have access to it. This is what worries me the most. And Torrent might be the only way to fix/solve it. By distributing these kind of material. Especially older books, older movies and older games.

  • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    I2P is not an alternative to bittorrent, but to IP networks. Essentially I2P is an overlay over the IP-based Internet.

    bittorrent can work through I2P just like it can over IP or Tor.

      • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        wow, this has blown up!

        some additional clarification:

        I2P is not universally supported by any bittorrent clients, because a bittorrent client needs specific knowledge about how to connect to the I2P network through an I2P router (by using the “SAM” protocol).
        the java based biglybt bittortent client has pretty good support as I hear, it supports I2P-specific DHT and Peer Exchange. DHT is used for peer discovery without a tracker, Peer Exchange is another tech that helps with finding more peers.

        qbittorrent (and a few others that use the libtorrent programming library) has got support for I2P around a year ago, but its experimental so far I think, or at least it hasn’t been tested that much.
        these bt clients don’t (yet) support DHT and PeX for I2P torrents. the functionality is missing from libtorrent and its single dev is very busy already.

        if you are interested about the technical aspects, here are some more words about using bittorrent with I2P from a developer perspective: https://geti2p.net/en/docs/applications/bittorrent

  • Kissaki@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    The article you linked answers most of your questions.

    1. Relative global upstream traffic went down, but not due to other file-sharing protocols but entirely different applications
    2. I2P is not mentioned anywhere in the article, nor any other sharing alternative
    3. VPN is mentioned as a potential reason for not being able to identify torrent traffic; VPN has become much more prevalent and promoted in the scene
    4. The article says, in piracy, streaming websites are much more popular now

    It has not been surpassed by another protocol. The relative numbers don’t say much about absolute numbers or usage.

    And 10 % of global internet upload is certainly no irrelevancy.