• Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      In a way, yes. Capitalism paved the way for Proletarian revolution, which ultimately was a dramatic improvement on the largely unindustrialized and poor backwater Tsarist regime.

    • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      The point is that it’s a class war. It always has been. It’s about a system of government where the country’s wealth is concentrated into a small, ruling class of billionaires, who use the media they own to keep the lower classes fighting with each other while they . . . the rich . . . run off with all the farking money.

      Oh wait. that’s capitalism. Amazing how much soviet Russians government has in common with “capitalism.”

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Wealth concentration was far more equalized in the Soviet system and far more concentrated in the Capitalist system it is today and the Tsarist regime it was before. This wealth was expanded into large safety nets like free healthcare and education, large infrastructure projects like trains, and public housing.

        It certainly wasn’t perfect, but it wasn’t Capitalism by any stretch, even during the NEP when there was significant market forces at play.

      • flashgnash@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        That’s not capitalism that’s just greed, one is an economic system the other is human nature that’ll come out in any society

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          The problem is that NutWrench is wrong, here. Wealth disparity shrank during the Soviet system and was higher before and after it.