• Brad Boimler@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    As long as micro G is a system app in my opinion it is the same why not run it as a sandboxed app. There is probably a reason why it can’t just think it would be more privacy first approach to sandbox it but that is just my opinion everyone’s threat model is different I don’t use Google at all anymore so non issue for me. Still better than stock Google Play true just think micro G could do more.

    • paradox2011@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      This interview with the developer of MicroG might be interesting if you’d like to learn more about it’s benefits (or downsides) over sandboxed Google Play services. It debunks a lot of misconceptions or rumours about MicroG.

      MicroG collects very little information about the user. It does less data collection than sandboxed Google Play despite it being a system app. MicroG is a more transparent, community driven piece of software that distances people from Google to a greater degree in my estimation, though I don’t have developer level understanding of the software. Just basing my thoughts on interviews and published information like the video above.

      Personally I prefer the privacy/open source oriented approach of MicroG, but I also run GrapheneOS so haven’t been able to use it for a few years.

    • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      MicroG is a fully open source, much smaller codebase (reduced line count) vs proprietary google binaries. I wish I could run microG on graphene, but absolutely will choose microG on calyx vs sandboxed play svcs.