Chinese authorities wrongfully detained more than 20 Tibetans and severely tortured a Tibetan village head named Gonpo Namgyal to death with the repeated use of electric equipment in detention for several months in Ponkor township, Darlag County in Golog in the traditional Tibetan province of Amdo now incorporated into Qinghai, Sichuan and Gansu provinces.

  • m532@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 hours ago

    But china doesnt do that

    Projection is when the usa propaganda takes one of its own crimes and changes all mentions of “usa” to “china”

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I’m pretty sure china does because that’s what all authoritarian empires have done and are doing throughout history.

      If there’s no evidence it just means they covered it up well enougg

      • davel@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 hours ago

        https://www.greanvillepost.com/2018/10/06/left-anticommunism-the-unkindest-cut/

        In the United States, for over a hundred years, the ruling interests tirelessly propagated anticommunism among the populace, until it became more like a religious orthodoxy than a political analysis. During the Cold War, the anticommunist ideological framework could transform any data about existing communist societies into hostile evidence. If the Soviets refused to negotiate a point, they were intransigent and belligerent; if they appeared willing to make concessions, this was but a skillful ploy to put us off our guard. By opposing arms limitations, they would have demonstrated their aggressive intent; but when in fact they supported most armament treaties, it was because they were mendacious and manipulative. If the churches in the USSR were empty, this demonstrated that religion was suppressed; but if the churches were full, this meant the people were rejecting the regime’s atheistic ideology. If the workers went on strike (as happened on infrequent occasions), this was evidence of their alienation from the collectivist system; if they didn’t go on strike, this was because they were intimidated and lacked freedom. A scarcity of consumer goods demonstrated the failure of the economic system; an improvement in consumer supplies meant only that the leaders were attempting to placate a restive population and so maintain a firmer hold over them. If communists in the United States played an important role struggling for the rights of workers, the poor, African-Americans, women, and others, this was only their guileful way of gathering support among disfranchised groups and gaining power for themselves. How one gained power by fighting for the rights of powerless groups was never explained. What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy, so assiduously marketed by the ruling interests that it affected people across the entire political spectrum.

      • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        Ah but have you considered my prejudices? I Think you’ll find them QUITE unfalsifiable

        Checkmate tankie

      • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 hours ago

        You’re sure China is doing it is because (checks notes), Europeans did it?

        Listen to yourself. You are not engaged in reasoning, you are engaged in projection.

        Consider that China has watched European empire so this sort of thing, determined it to be ineffective at producing a stable society, and is choosing to not do that thing.

      • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Damn, you’re just straight up doing the thing from the Parenti quote without even pretending otherwise.