• SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I can get people to tell me their life story and trauma within 10 minutes of meeting them.

    Someone tell me what psychology trick I’m doing so I can stop doing it!!!

    • Elaine Cortez@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I get this too! I don’t judge them, I listen because they’ve probably been wanting to do that for a long time. Another thing that happens with me is that “tough” types will approach me and start acting really friendly with me, whereas with other people they’re always angry and intimidating. I think there’s something about me that’s really disarming but like you, I have no idea what it is!

    • dipcart@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I have no idea why but this happens with most people in my family and we can even trace it back to my great grandma.

      I think it does come down to listening actively, but also by sharing a sense of openness and vulnerability. When you’re honest about yourself with others, they’re more likely to be honest with you.

        • dipcart@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Thank you for the reaction image and good luck with knowing too much about the people around you

      • JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        u/Sharkeatingbreakfast

        Autism is genetic, and many undiagnosed autistic children will become much harder to diagnose as adults because they will over adjust from their social awkwardness and become incredibly active listeners.

        They’ll often be told they’re “easy to talk/open up to” because they maintain great eye contact, nod along and give little responses throughout a story.

        I’m not saying you’re autistic necessarily, but the experience you’re explaining is one that I’ve had and many people I’ve known have had

  • x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Allowing yourself to be wrong. Especially as a male.

    Instead of trying to figure out a way to still kind of be correct, you just objectively reconsider the facts.

    It made me a better adult. I prefixed a lot of my statements with “I think” or “I believe” to emphasis the possibility for me to be wrong. And I’m more inclined to ask questions. (Which sadly gets a lot of people riled up because they have a hard time believing I’m not doing it sarcastically.)

    • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Try using “to the best of my knowledge”, I find it is indicating that your knowledge is not complete.

      But it also indicates you have thought of the situation.

      • Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        This has been a lifelong habit for me and something I respect and appreciate and think virtuous, but I’m starting to think I should train myself out of it. “I think”, or “to the best of my knowledge” frequently seems to broadcast “I’m just guessing at random without thought” or with some people it seems to convey “I’m wrong about…”. It also very often seems to encode “it’s best not to listen to the remaining words of this sentence in case my wrongness is contagious”.

        As frustrated as I sound by this, I kind of get it I suppose. I thought I was indicating humility and a willingness to change the opinions or ideas I express if the conversation partner has reason to challenge them, however it seems in many cases it just indicates a lack of confidence in my statements. They perhaps might argue that they never thought I was arrogant or lacking in humility to begin with and of course I could be wrong, everyone could so specifically bringing it up or alluding to it unnecessarily like that just suggests you’re trying to mask that you have no idea what you’re talking about. I suppose one might also that the willingness to change your opinion in light of a challenge to it is supposed to be a given so there’s no point trying to show it either since if you weren’t willing to do so that would become apparent anyway. I don’t know if anyone really thinks any of this, but there’s probably something like that operating subconsciously.

      • x00z@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Good point, but it doesn’t have a natural sounding translation in my language, although I do use “as far as I know”.

  • Godort@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    The soctatic method. It forces people to actually think about their position in an argument

    • iltoroargento@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I don’t like the Socratic method as it is employed in classrooms. I think the method of questioning is fine, and dissecting a subject can be fun with the right group and foreknowledge, but most instructors absolutely suck at making sure all students are up to speed with whatever is being discussed.

      I don’t see its value as a teaching tool without a strong enough instructor to prepare the students for its use and to guide the discussions in a productive manner.

      Every professor I’ve ever had who used this method basically wasted class time with fill in the blank response questions. These are not higher order thinking discussions and do nothing to actually broaden understanding of whichever subject is being discussed. It seems like a cop out for the professor to me, at least how I’ve seen it used in multiple major universities.

      I’ve had better Socratic discussions while high as fuck with my buddies after class than when we were actually in the lecture hall.

        • iltoroargento@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Seriously, lol. Just lecture if you’re gonna lecture. I hate playing hide the ball with my own students because it’s just a waste of time for everyone involved.

      • Joshi@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        The Socratic method is used extensively in medical training to the point that I think most doctors wouldn’t think of it as the Socratic method but rather just as the way you speak to students and trainees.

        I can’t imagine how it could work in a lecture hall, it’s best used one on one or at most small groups.

        • iltoroargento@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Absolutely. Small group is a must. I think the variations with seminars (always around 20 because universities want to maximize their profits) and lecture halls are terrible.

          I see it working with 10ish people at the absolute max.

        • iltoroargento@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Lol no. These guys were tenured professors doing the same shit for years. It’s a systemic issue where they rely on a definition of the “Socratic method” that is completely divorced from the original and functional tool. It’s a buzz word they’ve been misinterpreting for over a century.

  • meejle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    A good retail one: don’t say “sorry for your wait.” Say “thank you for waiting” or “thank you for being so patient”.

    Something to do with… it makes people feel good about themselves if they think they’ve done something for you, which in turn makes them more likely to keep being patient.

    • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I might be in the minority, but it is painfully obvious and pisses me off when companies do this. I’d much rather get an apology than a comment on my own emotional regulation while taking zero accountability. They’re basically saying it’s my fault for being annoyed.

      I don’t think a retail manager would appreciate, “Thank you for remaining calm as your car took unexpected damage” over “I’m sorry I hit your car,” so why do they think I’d prefer the former for them making me wait?

    • Elextra@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      So similar thing I learned in sales. I avoid using the word “help” because if you ask something like “is there anything I can help you with”? The word “help” subconsciously makes them feel like you are implying they are weak, vulnerable, and need assistance. Where as if you ask them “is there anything I can do for you”? The word “do” has a more positive connotation and implies that you are offering a service or a gift, which more people are likely to agree to.

    • Joshi@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Someone told this to workers at a cafe I go to occasionally. They don’t usually have a particularly long wait which makes it seem insincere and a little ridiculous.

    • kipo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I often don’t like it when customer service people say this to me if I have been waiting to resolve an issue that is the company’s fault, because my waiting is barely a choice; the company screwed up and now I am ‘forced’ to spend time getting it resolved.

      Only apologize or thank me when it’s personal and sincere. (The size of the business matters a lot in if the apologies or thanks feel genuine.)

    • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      This works with signs, too. “Keep off the grass” is the least effective, followed by “please keep off the grass”, with “thank you for keeping off the grass” being the most effective.

      • hakase@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I’m pretty sure this is more likely to make me walk across the grass though - it feels like they’re assuming what I’m doing, which feels offensive enough for me to make sure they’re wrong about it.

        • davel@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yup. “Thank you for keeping off the grass” is presumptuous. It presumes that I have kept off the grass and/or will keep off the grass. And that kinda makes me want to stomp all over the grass.

  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Taking a walk every day helps improve the mood on my dopamine deprived brain.

    Sometimes the person you really need to trick with psychology is yourself.

  • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Be kind and use people’s names. Also, just asking for stuff.

    You’d be amazed how far it will take you just to ask for something, using a person’s name, and being kind about it. Demand something and people will be reluctant to give you a thing.

  • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    People just want to be accepted and loved. Use this knowledge to get almost anyone to do what you want.

    Observe their body language. Do they cross their arms a lot? How much eye contact do they make? Do they shift around when talking? Do their eyes dart around the room?

    All these are clues about their personality and disposition and you can tailor your communication to them depending on how receptive they are. Do they laugh easily? What makes them laugh? Do they talk a lot? Do they talk about themselves?

    Finding out to what degree of extrovert/introvert they are can go a long way into successfully manipulating anyone around you to do what you want.

    It’s how I’ve made friends and how I’ve dated women with variable rates of success.

  • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    When in an argument, wait for the other person to stop talking then maintain eye contact and say nothing. They’ll feel the need to fill the void and keep talking after a few seconds, but this move throws them off balance and helps calm them down. Also works great with angry customers at retail jobs.

    Also, when you suspect someone is lying to you. After the silence, they’ll often try to cover up the lie because they suspect you’ve figured them out.

  • weeeeum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Something niche to my field (custom furniture and woodworking) is that RAISING prices can increase sales. Wealthy clientele want both a piece that is quality, but also something “worthy” of gracing their home.

    A mentor of mine had beautiful, handmade pieces for 600$. He was still in his “starving artist” phase and kept slashing prices to make some money back. He had lunch with a friend who was a painter. he discussed the amount of time (30 hours) and materials that went into these pieces and they weren’t selling for even 600$. She immediately told him he was insane and to jack up prices. He told all the stores he was showcasing in to raise the prices from 600$ to 3000$. He sold ALL 10 of them in 3 months.

    Pricing is a careful balance of charging what is fair, and what the client expects to pay. If you are building a dining table for a client that has $500k worth of art and paintings covering the walls, he is expecting to pay in excess of $50,000. If you quote him $10,000, hes gonna get cold feet and go to someone else charging more.

    Same phenomenon in this video. Banksy selling pieces for 60$ on the street and barely sells any. His pieces usually sell for $20k

    https://youtu.be/7mxJT2uXtrE?si=m0RexNfLI2EBIydf

    People are HIGHLY class oriented and kind of stupid. The price is not the piece but what it says. They want a piece that says “I’m rich as fuck”.

  • A_Wild_Zeus_Chase@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    “Langer demonstrated this fact by asking a small favor of people waiting in line to use a library copying machine: “Excuse me, I have five pages. May I use the Xerox machine because I’m in a rush?”

    The effectiveness of this request-plus-reason was nearly total: Ninety-four percent of those asked let her skip ahead of them in line.

    Compare this success rate to the results when she made the request only: “Excuse me, I have five pages. May I use the Xerox machine?” Under those circumstances, only 60 percent of those asked complied.

    At first glance, it appears that the crucial difference between the two requests was the additional information provided by the words “because I’m in a rush.”

    But a third type of request tried by Langer showed that this was not the case. It seems that it was not the whole series of words, but the first one, “because,” that made the difference.

    Instead of including a real reason for compliance, Langer’s third type of request used the word “because” and then, adding nothing new, merely restated the obvious: “Excuse me, I have five pages. May I use the Xerox machine because I have to make some copies?”

    The result was that once again nearly all (93 percent) agreed, even though no real reason, no new information, was added to justify their compliance.”

    Excerpt From Influence Robert B. Cialdini, PhD

    • neidu3@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I managed to skip the entire line at Ohare security screening by just walking past people waiting patiently while repeating “sorry, plane is boarding, excuse me, boarding, pardon me…” etc. Nobody bothered objecting and got out of the way for me.

      My incoming flight was delayed, and immigration took forever, so once it was time to get to my connection the plane started boarding. After security I had to run, and I got to the gate just in time.

      • observes_depths@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        This is more of an unwritten rule of airport security lines, the staff will let you through if you tell them you’re plane is boarding.

    • davel@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Many of my friends are familiar with this study, and an inside joke of ours is to, when asking for something, end it with “because reasons.”