Just this year he lost a bid to build a new property which was to be built into a remote hillside alongside Lake Wanaka on New Zealand’s South Island.
So no. No bunkers. Didn’t get approval and would be a pretty easy to find if someone gets approval for a bunker somewhere.
Those two articles. Both articles and not much more than speculation.
One article actually hints at it. However it doesn’t change the facts. NZ is a Yellowstone waiting to happen. Bunker or not the island is toasts.
Also there’s a reason NZ doesn’t have skyscrapers an d concrete buildings. The amount of earthquakes would make building a bunker pretty dam near impossible.
Deeper you dig to hide from calamity above you. Closer you get to calamity below you.
We do have plenty tall buildings in Auckland Welly chc and stuff. But not dotted all over the island. Likely because you’d need to drill into volcanic rock. Which is pretty expensive and difficult to do. I assume they place the taller building in places without volcanic rock.
Can you counterweight a bunker deep under earth ?
That was my point
I’m sure Japan and every other nation with super volcanoes had the same issues. Which is the point. NZ isn’t off planet. It has just as much risk as anywhere else. If not more due to Taupo super volcano.
I think if it goes. North island goes. It’s a super volcano. Whole of Taupo. So South island might survive but the ash cloud and radiation might do them in
Just this year he lost a bid to build a new property which was to be built into a remote hillside alongside Lake Wanaka on New Zealand’s South Island.
So no. No bunkers. Didn’t get approval and would be a pretty easy to find if someone gets approval for a bunker somewhere.
Those two articles. Both articles and not much more than speculation.
One article actually hints at it. However it doesn’t change the facts. NZ is a Yellowstone waiting to happen. Bunker or not the island is toasts.
Also there’s a reason NZ doesn’t have skyscrapers an d concrete buildings. The amount of earthquakes would make building a bunker pretty dam near impossible.
Deeper you dig to hide from calamity above you. Closer you get to calamity below you.
What’s your definition of a skyscraper? We have a load of buildings over 150m high, 40+ stories.
We have fancy earthquake tech for our tall buildings, like counterweights.
We’re the same as Japan, we’re both on the “ring of fire”, basically little scabs of islands where continents rub against each other.
Japan has loads of tall buildings. And concrete ones too.
“the island is toasts” lol.
We do have plenty tall buildings in Auckland Welly chc and stuff. But not dotted all over the island. Likely because you’d need to drill into volcanic rock. Which is pretty expensive and difficult to do. I assume they place the taller building in places without volcanic rock.
Can you counterweight a bunker deep under earth ?
That was my point
I’m sure Japan and every other nation with super volcanoes had the same issues. Which is the point. NZ isn’t off planet. It has just as much risk as anywhere else. If not more due to Taupo super volcano.
Which is overdue
https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20230804-taupo-the-super-volcano-under-new-zealands-largest-lake
I think expense & population not feasibility is why we don’t have them dotted all over.
Surely an underground rock bunker would be exactly what they’re looking for? Very “evil villain” aesthetic.
I’m dubious of claims of being overdue. How solid is the science backing those claims?
Well, the upside is if taupo goes, I should get a good view being only a few hours away 😬
Makes sense,
Well volcano lair sounds great. Until it blows.
Pretty good science. But who knows.
I think if it goes. North island goes. It’s a super volcano. Whole of Taupo. So South island might survive but the ash cloud and radiation might do them in