I have been thinking a lot since the election about what could explain the incredibly high numbers of Americans who seem incapable of critical thinking, or really any kind of high level rational thought or analysis.

Then I stumbled on this post https://old.reddit.com/r/guns/comments/16ires5/lead_exposure_from_shooting_is_a_much_more/

Which essentially explains that “Shooting lead bullets at firing ranges results in elevated BLLs at concentrations that are associated with a variety of adverse health outcome"

I looked at the pubmed abstract in that Reddit post and also this one https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5289032/

Which states, among other things, “Workers exposed to lead often show impaired performance on neurobehavioral test involving attention, processing, speed, visuospatial abilities, working memory and motor function. It has also been suggested that lead can adversely affect general intellectual performance.”

Now, given that there are well in excess of 300 million guns in the United States, is it possible lead exposure at least partially explains how brain dead many Americans seem to be?

This is a genuine question not a troll and id love to read some evidence to the contrary if any is available

  • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I doubt that there are enough people shooting enough guns often enough for it to be more than just trace exposures, it likely must be something else.

    • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Yes it’s actually a pretty ignorant idea. Lead exposure is more likely from car exhaust from leaded gas, which has been severely limited since the 80s.

      • Wiz@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Plus, Gen-X and Boomers were exposed to a lot of lead.

        Gasoline types used to be “Regular or Unleaded” and Regular, I think, and required a"special" engine.

        • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Leaded (“regular”) gas will destroy a catalytic converter. A car without a cat could usually run leaded or unleaded. Some may knock running unleaded if they’re super old or broken in some way. I believe leaded was usually cheaper.

          I wouldn’t try running leaded in a modern engine even if you removed the cats. God knows what else it would screw up.

        • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Also fungicides/pesticides can cause dementia. One of the first signs of early onset dementia is loss of empathy. So not very surprising many old rural folks have become jaded people

      • Revan343@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Don’t forget the deliberate effort by Republicans to nerf the public education system

        • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Nerf is too nice a way to say it. They want to abolish the Department of Education. Their goal is that only the children of the rich will get anything close to a good education.

          • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            It’s by design. Keep people stupid, and use religion for its intended use, a tool for control.

            We the masses are the foundation for their wealth and power.

  • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I think there’s a much higher chance of slow-poisoning with heavy metals and other chemicals by food then shooting guns. Food quality standards in the US are poor. As well as nutrition wise. Malnutrition has a big effect on people their brain. The brain needs loads of stuff to function properly, not just corn syrup and fats. And with the poor US food safety regulations and poor tap water there’s more poison then nutricions coming into your body.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          It is absolutely driving me bonkers. I think the two words will collapse into one over the next century if people don’t stop making this mistake. It’s so common and it irks me so!

          • Arigion@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            All good. I appreciated your comment since I’m not a native English speaker. I had to read the comment twice to find the “then”, because my brain was on auto-correct. So I really wanted to thank you, but than my inner clown took over. Happens from time to time. Sorry about that.

            • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Lol the funny thing is that I literally didn’t even notice the spelling of “thenk” until now!

              I appreciate the responses on two levels haha

              Curious – what is your native language?

              • Arigion@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                You’re welcome. I’m German. And you probably missed the “than” in my previous comment. Isn’t it fun how our brian works? (I was soo tempted to write “your welcome” 😀)

                • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Nah I caught your “then”. I’ve become hyper aware of that one. Your Greman Brian ist interresant

  • WraithGear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I may be mistaken, but there was talk years ago about regulating lead bullets. They were to switch to steel ones and it caused a whole story about ammunition becoming more expensive and started a run on lead bullets. If true, wile there would be this collected leads ammo, steel would be more prolific. But there could be some other contaminate in shooting, or some other reason. But i fear that this is more of a problem of the human condition then any outside factor

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s a known risk, and there are guidelines to lessen or prevent lead exposure at the range, but I’d wager most shooters aren’t aware.

    For example:

    Use jacketed or lead free bullets and primers.

    Wash your face, arms and hands after using the range.

    Change your clothes and shoes after using the range.

    Wash your range clothes separately from your families.

    Do not eat, drink, or smoke on the range.

    Take the same precautions after cleaning your guns.

    That being said, the folks at largest risk for this kind of exposure would be those who fire guns the most often, so that population would be the canary in the coal mine so to speak.

    https://www.quora.com/How-often-do-police-officers-practice-at-ranges

    "How often do police officers practice at ranges?

    Most departments require re-qualification training once a year.

    My department required shooting three times a year, once with our sidearm, once with our 12 gauge shotguns, and once with our AR 15 carbines.

    As for my self, I go to the range 8 to 10 times a year. I am usually accompanied by 5 or 6 of my fellow officers. We are not for the fun, we are training by using the state required shooting plans and we add a little extra to it.

    Most officers I know only go to range when required for re-qualification. Not because they don’t want to, shooting off a couple hundreds rounds is an expensive proposition."

    Yeah… Might be a reason cops seem dumber than average, and they don’t hire the brightest to begin with.

    https://abcnews.go.com/US/court-oks-barring-high-iqs-cops/story?id=95836

    • hangman@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Thanks for being the first person in this thread to actually post some useful tips to get the lead out, so to speak.

      • Libb@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Thanks for being the first person in this thread** to actually post some useful tips** to get the lead out, so to speak.

        Sorry to contradict you here but, like I suggested in another comment, reading a book instead of playing with a gun is also a very efficient (and cheap) way to lessen lead exposure :p

  • Onionguy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    That’s a really interesting angle, I also wonder how much damage the lead in gasoline did before they banned it.

    • littletranspunk@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Kind of, low level lead exposure does lead to higher aggression as well. I have yet to search out the paper, but I will do verification when I’m not at work

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Was the majority of the German voting public lead-poisoned in the 30s? I don’t think lead was even put in gas then. Those Germans almost certainly were not lead poisoned, and they put a monster into power.

    I get wanting a good explanation, but in reality, it’s a simple but unsatisfying explanation. It applies to every country and every population in every era. People are fuckin’ stupid. Carlin said it best:

    “Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.”

    • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The German population went through serious economic troubles. Wheelbarrows of cash to buy stuff. Economically troubled people get angry and revolt, and in democratic systems that means firstly voting for the extreme candidates, the ones with a good story. Anger shuts down critical thinking and they don’t think about other consequences of their vote.

      That’s how many elections went in a lot of counties in the last few years too.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah, I get that saying people are fuckin stupid is dismissive and over simplified in a lot of cases… But it’s also still true and a factor, which adds to all the other factors you’re talking about. Ultimately I think if people were more educated and intelligent, they could overcome a lot of irrationality.

        • subignition@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s deliberate. The right wing has been gradually whittling down the quality of our education system for more than a generation.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Right, but that’s where the analogy breaks down “wheelbarrows of cash”. You can try to reference that situation, you can try to talk about desperate people just wanting to lash out but no one is pushing around “wheelbarrows of cash”. Whatever desperate situation people think they are in pales before the reality. The huge difference in severity means they are hardly comparable at all. By pretty much any stat, we should be doing ok: there have been many times we’ve had it worse, so why is this the moment?

        This is where the last couple decades of hatred and divisiveness come in. Politicians bringing forth blame, scapegoats, stoking outrage at our problems. The hatred is always there. The violence is always there. Were conditions to a constant state of anger so that’s where too many turn for even a minor downturn

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Interesting. Though I can’t say when Germany added it. I believe the 20s was when America started doing it, but according to a podcast I listened to recently, America was the first to start doing it. And also the effects of lead poisoning take decades to manifest.

    • zqps@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I dislike this saying because it’s always been assumed, never proven, that intelligence follows a normal distribution. That is if it can even be mapped to a single, consistent, comparable number.

      But your point is valid. Though I’d add that it’s not universally true. Fascists thrive on fear and ignorance. Give people access to a good education, which includes political education, and they are far more resilient to these tactics.

      Which is why it’s especially nefarious that conservatives love to undermine, vilify, and defund education.

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I dislike this saying because it’s always been assumed, never proven, that intelligence follows a normal distribution.

        Okay, think of the median instead lol

      • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Uneducated people are easier to control. Uneducated people are more likely to join the military or police. It’s that simple. And if you haven’t heard, Trump’s handlers are going to try to abolish the Department of Education.

  • Some of us were around when leaded gasoline was the norm, and every municipality had a crime rate drop that corellates to their unleaded gas mandate.

    Then there’s lead in candy which was a problem until the FDA shut that down.

    There still is lead in fuel, and so kids who play in urban playgrounds are supposed to wash their hands before eating anything.

    So if our people have detectable elevated lead levels (it has a plenty-long bio half life), I’d question automotive exhaust and industry before worrying about guns at the range. Unless someone is squeezing off a hundred rounds a day.

  • otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Pretty sure it’s much more prevalent than would be tied specifically to gun use as a catalyst, though…

  • Caveman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    That’s a very interesting hypothesis. For sure it affects it and there might be other chemicals that get combusted as well. Not sure if the quantity is the same as with leaded gasoline and I’m pretty sure the proportion of Americans that go to shooting ranges on a regular basis is pretty small. Interesting post regardless