This subject tends to draw out the worst in people, oddly enough. She has this strange Order of horny men and faux-feminists who will die defending her over I don’t know what. If that’s you, please, put your emotions aside for a second, and look at Sydney Sweeney objectively (ignore the large rack, blonde hair, and smooth skin and LOOK AT HER)… Is she “beautiful”? She kinda has a horse-mouth smile, her eyes are weirdly far apart, she has big ears, and a pug nose. Sexy, sure. But any woman can be sexy if she’s not obese and has Hollywood image juggernaut at her disposal. Koinophilia? Check. Properly proportioned body? Check. Youthful? Check. But is she beautiful? Personally, I’d say no. Just another busty blond that frankly is probably a lovely woman, and she is attractive no doubt… but she’s no work of art.
I think she’s gorgeous. But who describes people as works of art? Thats weird (to me)
Do you think she’s “gorgeous” or just attractive? There’s a difference. Like, when I look at Bernini’s Apollo and Daphne, or Thorvaldsen’s Christus, they almost bring me to my knees. They are almost metaphysical in their nature, they capture something beyond mere human attraction. Snow-capped Teton’s and other stunning vistas are an example. These things is what it is to be beautiful. Sydney Sweeney does not evoke this sensation in anyone.
Uh, I mean gorgeous and attractive mean the same thing in my book.
then Jung would describe you as “undifferentiated”.
Who is that
Carl Jung. Psychoanalyst and philosopher.