Cigarettes
Yes, but have you ever tried being addicted to nicotine? /s
There’s healthier ways
Advertising
Tiktok
Religion
Lots of subscription based services, like heated seats in cars
Trump and the American Nazi Party
Trump
Lemmy moment.
He exists because his parents had sex. Having sex is stupid now?
haiii turkish person :3 meraba
merabalar :3
:3 selam
db0’da hayat nasıl
güzel ya tam benlik server. Sen nşye lemm.ee yii seçtin
oyle kayit olurken ismi komik gelmisti, sonra hexbear, lemmygrad .world olaylarini filan duydum
iyi ki de lemm.ee yi secmisim, kimseyle defedere olmuyoruz
iyi iyi, büyük severlara girmeyerek iyi yapmışsın. Matrix veya discord varsa ekleyebilir miyim? Türk böyle fediverse falan ilgisi olan bi arkadaş çok isterim
They would go bad instantly. I would assume these would be only suitable for banana bread. Reminds me of prechopped veggies that are way overpriced.
Both these bananas and the pre-chopped veggies are nice for people with disabilities.
Please stop with justifying things that are terrible for people and the world. If these items are needed for people with disabilities, you don’t take a natural container, remove it and cover it in plastic. The solution would be to create something that is created once and does the job required indefinitely.
Are there more people with disabilities, or more stupid people?
You may not think it’s not popular and a waste,but that’s because the people who need and buy these items are generally doing their shopping when you’re at school/work.
I do not. I’m just asking if there are more people with disabilities, or more stupid people?
Oh that makes more sense. But they should wrap the bananas individually so they don’t brown as quick
Edit: wait, if someone with a disability can’t peel a banana, how will they open this package?
if someone with a disability can’t peel a banana, how will they open this package?
I think you’re coming to a realization.
At least they aren’t packaged each with the plastic wrap.
I do not know if that is better or worse, but that is something definitely.
Definitely worse-- Japan has a huge problem with waste, and a ton of that is because of their culture around packaging things.
I’ve noticed this and I’d like to learn more about it. I’ve always appreciated the careful thought they put into packages or containers… But does it gotta be plastic?! Agh.
Specific models of dumpsters found in national parks. Apparently making sure that the smartest bear can’t get into a dumpster while making sure the dumbest person can is a grey zone.
There have been national park visitors who have asked at what time the animals are let out of their cages and put back in them. Then again, that might be an education issue rather than a stupidity problem. Would it be ethical to experiment on these people by suggesting “we’ll tell you if you can get that dumpster open”?
Caveat: Having never seen those dumpsters, I have the nagging feeling that I could well be outsmarted by the bears.
That first can very well be a mixup between zoos, those parks where you can drive your car through and look at animals and national parks. I can fully see people getting it mixup a bit. So I would put that under education miss.
And regarding the dumpsters I have been outsmarted by a child proff container so I will show respect to the dumpster.
Caveat: Having never seen those dumpsters, I have the nagging feeling that I could well be outsmarted by the bears.
There’s another factor though: The bear will keep trying over and over if it smells something in there, for hours if it feels like it. Tourists, meanwhile, might not even try again if they can’t get it open right away.
1000%. It’s a miracle when someone uses the trash cans or pack in/out at all.
Leave no trace isn’t common knowledge, nor respected by lots of people, especially the less experienced or invested. Even the slightest inconvenience can be the difference between the can and the ground.
I remember a lady reviewed a solar eclipse party on Facebook 1star because they held it midweek instead of on the weekend and she couldn’t go
Warning labels that say shit like “Contains: Milk” on a carton of milk.
Did you hear about the butter recall for that?
Egg carton that says “Contains Egss”, like yeah, I sure hope so
I hate to be “that guy” but in theee cases, it just makes more sense to have some extraneous labeling rather than have special clauses in the regulation dictating when it’s obvious enough that the label can be omitted.
Keeping the rules as simple as possible reduces the chances of loopholes and ambiguity, at the expense of sometimes resulting in things like a jar of peanut butter stating “contains peanuts” on the label.
It makes no sense and it’s a side effect of an over litigious society.
It only makes no sense until you stop and consider how to define and implement a better rule, when the only real benefit would be to prevent people snarking about milk having a “contains milk” labeling.
Labeling for ingredients and possible cross contamination concerns doesn’t require that milk warns about milk.
Do you think that someone sits down and makes a list of all items that need to be labeled as containing X, which is then updated each time a new food or recipe hits the store shelves?
Or is it more likely that regulators simply state that all foods for human consumption containing more than some percent by weight of X must be labeled as containing X?
If your goal is to ensure that consumers are alerted to certain ingredients for allergy or other purposes, you care very much about a product not getting labeled properly, and you don’t really care if something obvious gets the label.
I’m not really sure why this is so hard to grasp…
‘Caution: Hot’ on coffee.
Shops with perpetual “sales” and prices ending with 99.
JC Penney went through a period where they did away with their perpetual “sale” and normalized their pricing. Their sales tanked as a result. Apparently a lot of people who shop there are idiots.
The one time I went while they were just offering low prices was awesome. Just $8/shirt, no coupons or sales to turn a $20 shirt into a ln $8 one. Most people really like seeing a big number then having to pay a smaller one though.
I hate that “marketing” is just a science of bypassing peoples’ rationality to sell them on short-term emotion, then reinforcing and encouraging stupidity to keep the loop going.
The former SVP of Apple Retail Ron Johnson, specifically. He actually thought the people who shopped at JC Penny were the same as the people who shopped at an Apple Store.
Fox
The FBI agent or the animal?
Republicans.
CEOs
Trump presidencies
*loudly grieves in American * :`(
Probably a whole bunch of us. Stupidity may result in unwanted and/or unplanned pregnancies.
Dealer add-ons at a car dealership.
They can be good negotiating points, though. Often, they will reduce the price of the vehicle more than the cost of the add on because they make more profit on the add-on than the difference in price of the car. And often the add-ons are preinstalled, so they have to give them to you anyway. Not true for all brands or dealers, but works for some.
With my last car there was a windshield coating, leather seat coating and bumpers on the door edges. After getting them nearly at the price I wanted, I told them I’d buy the seat coating if they’d lower the price another thousand below my previous price. The windshield coating and bumpers were also on the car when I finally got it. But I didn’t get the warranty on them, of course.
Something like this happened to me. I ended up buying an extended warranty that I didn’t really want, but it was because I insisted that I’m not going to pay MSRP for this vehicle. They knocked off a couple grand, and I spent as much on the warranty. At least I got something for the money.
Well I also did get the warrantee on the seats, though I never needed to use it.
