Why do people spend money (and quite a lot of it) for devices that have less functionality than a smartphone?

  • Tablet is just a bigger screen, but not same power like a laptop.

  • Smartwatch is just tracking device that sends even more of your personal data.

And BOTH are another battery that you have to worry about.

  • SGH Fan@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I use a smartwatch as a second phone that’s always on me. Especially when I forget my main phone.

    • Ogygus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Makes sense! In that context, the missing functionality work in its favour:

      • kid won’t install apps that steal data and money, or games
      • small screen means he won’t be using it 24/7 and develop screen addiction

      And he can’t lose it as easily.

  • stewie410@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    My partner is a mechanic and is often underneath a vehicle when a notification comes through; so for him, the watch acts like an extension of his phone that he doesn’t have to worry about falling out of his pocket.

    And while he does have to worry about damaging the watch, this would still be true if it was a phone in his pocket; but would just be more surface area to get knocked into things.

    Personally, I work at a desk all day; so outside of a few phone calls a month, I probably don’t even need a phone…

  • BoofStroke@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Tablet: TV in my camper van. But it wasn’t expensive. I spent $120 on it new.

    Watch: Companion to the phone. Does strava things beyond just riding a bike.

  • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Because they’re different than a laptop, desktop, phone, with different capabilities and limitations.

    Why are you using Lemmy when reddit works better?

    (By “better”, I’m sure someone could make arguments why reddit works better for them, that would make as much sense as OP’s opinion on “better” regarding these devices).

    Or more simply, your opinion is just that - your opinion.

    • Ogygus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      This makes no sense.

      There is a reason both us are on Lemmy, but It still doesn’t make sense to compare software to hardware.

      Its not about opinions. I am asking actively: WHY? why do you use a tablet or smartwatch?

  • BartrandDuGuesclin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Tablet - if you don’t need laptop power, but still would like to use some laptop like features (keyboard+mouse, Dex/desktop mode etc), or simply enjoying a bigger screen.

    Watch - There are SOOO many different watches out there nowadays, with SOOO many different purposses. Some are really nothing like Samsung’s , Apple’s or Google’s “tracking devices”.

    I got myself a somewhat pricey Garmin because i want to get more in shape (i have cardiac arrythmia, having troubles sleeping, depression and some bad health things happened in my family lately). Do i get tracked (assuming you mean the data farming thingies…)? Probably, a bit at least. But having a tool with many, many build-in tools that helps me get in shape and gives me some insights, has pretty much ‘unlimited’ battery life (solar version) and has some features that are just ‘handy/fun’ to have? I’d give up a little of my ‘personal info’ for that.

    And, with many optional features, open-source apps and OS’s, devices don’t always are ‘tracking devices’. Put in a little effort and things can be pretty sweet!

  • Stomata@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Tablets have bigger screen. This is important for some people but start watchs are something that i don’t find useful

  • shoulderoforion@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I asked the same question, until I found myself overweight and needing to start some sort of exercise practice, started walking, so got a cheaper level fitness tracker/watch, which is easier to refer to while engaged in activity than removing my phone from my pocket, it also is able to take readings directly from my body being pressed directly against it, so yeah, that’s why

  • atrielienz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s about what I would or could use it for that I wouldn’t use a phone for. I don’t want a giant phone. I don’t really enjoy watching videos/movies on a phone. For home control I don’t need anything but wifi and maybe Bluetooth and I’m not interested in paying smartphone prices for the privilege. Same thing for viewing weather or schedules at a glance. Having that functionality to check on a smart phone is fine. Useful. Having it on a tablet where I can glance at it while getting dressed is better. And the speakers are generally better with better battery life (more space for a bigger battery) on a tablet. If you don’t have the use case for a piece of tech, of course it doesn’t make sense.

    • Ogygus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      I guess that is what I am doing: searching for a use case, but the smartphone remains undefeated!

      The only use case that I can find is to use it as a backup laptop: in the event I lose or break the laptop, i could get by with a tablet.

      Although i could also get by with the smartphone 🤔

  • Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I agree with you about watches. Tablets though, I disagree. I have several different tablets and they do different things in my workflow from my laptops or phones. My tablets can be an ebook reader, weather center, and video viewer. One of them, I read comic books on. They’re easier to use for those purposes than my laptop. I would need a second monitor to do those things, and I would need to switch it to tate mode for comic books and other ebooks to be comfortable for me to read. Plus, I couldn’t read easily in bed or somewhere like that even with the form factor of the smallest netbook in my collection.

      • Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        I mean that I have two different radar apps along with the Accuweather software. I look at it both for long-term and short-term forecasts. The last time I had a dedicated device just to do weather with the granularity and scale that I have on my tablet, the unit was called a home weather center (and required both GPS and internet access).

  • rah@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    less functionality than a smartphone

    Tablet is just a bigger screen

    A bigger screen is more functionality.

    • Ogygus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Well, i guess so.

      By that logox, an external, portable screen connected to the smartphone is even more functionality!

  • bluGill@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I hate watches. Back before pocket phones (I’m old enough to remember when car phones were a thing for the rich) I carried a pocket watch instead of a wrist watch like most people had. Once I got a flip phone which fit in my pocket I stopped using the pocket watch. (I don’t remember why I had both a “candy bar” phone and a pocket watch)

  • maxalmonte14@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Tablet is just a bigger screen…

    And this is why I got a tablet, I needed more space in my screen 🤷‍♂️

    • Ogygus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      But then, why not get an external portable monitor connected to the smartphone?

      • maxalmonte14@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Because then I’m giving my phone more responsibility and the goal is to take away some from it, I don’t want to be reading and get bombarded with notifications from social media, or get calls, or drain my battery by doing do. I want a dedicated device for that, an a tablet is more capable than an e-reader. I also want to practice writing and a tablet with a digital pen is good for that purpose.

  • ctkatz@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    since a lot of functionality at my job that doesn’t require me to physically be in the office can be done on a web browser I use my tablet as a work computer if the office is occupied. before this year I used my smartwatch as a phone monitor because even vibrating I can’t feel my phone ringing in my pocket or vibrate for text messages. and it was literally vitally important that I be available 24/7. these days I no longer need to be constantly available but I now have to monitor my glucose levels so I found a watchface and corresponding phone app to send that information to my phone.

    tablets and watches still have a place for a lot of people.

    • Ogygus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I was also interested in glucose monitoring, but the Samsung watch7 only gives an estimate.

      The technology is still way behind.

  • _bcron_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I have a Garmin for trail running, but it has a compass, offline maps, barometric altimeter, bunch of other stuff. I used it to plan a 2000 mile route through Canada while driving last summer because my phone had shit-tier 2G/3G roaming. I have it scheduled to go into ultra battery conservation mode when I should be sleeping and only need to charge it every 2 weeks.

    It also records activities even without a phone, just need internet to upload it to Strava later, so pretty handy to be able to run without a phone (Strava or it didn’t happen lol)

    • Ogygus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      What Garmin are you using?

      I could look into a watch that needs to be recharged never every few weeks.

    • cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Off-topic, but: do you need some Garmin account to use these functionalities? I am looking into such a watch, but would not like to be dependent on some online service/account to use it.

      • _bcron_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        The big tl;dr is that a lot of stuff will work, but a lot of things relying on historical data will not work (resting heart rate, weekly step count, sleep, etc).

        But, the app/account is unobtrusive to the point that you could name yourself Mickey Mouse on creation, just to get a user ID for the watch to point to, and set permissions on the app on some schedule just to have the watch sync that data.

        No sort of verification/authentication of identity at account creation and the app/services are free (I’m sure, given this day and age, there’s premium/subscription stuff but like I said it’s unobtrusive and I’ve never once been nagged to upgrade my account)