cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/15995282

Real unfortunate news for GrapheneOS users as Revolut has decided to ban the use of ‘non-google’ approved OSes. This is currently being posted about and updated by GrahpeneOS over at Bluesky for those who want to follow it more closely.

  • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    OK McDonald’s, I will not use your most cost effective ordering method. I guess I will just have to order my 10 individually custom cheeseburgers at the counter instead. I might have to have e the order read back, and change my mind about a few burgers.

    • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      As a former employee… That does nothing. Crazies that spend 15 min to order some fries were common.

      If you go at rush hour it can be annoying to the employee and other customers, but at the end of the day nobody will remember and you would have spent 20 min and 10 dollars (which is 9 dollars material profit for MacDonald).

      Just. Don’t. Go. To. Macdonald’s.

    • bountygiver [any]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      that’s just screwing with the workers though, and the workers sure as hell is not going to get paid extra for your custom order

      • Woht24@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        This viewpoint is so stupid.

        The cashier is paid to take orders, whether they take 1 long obnoxious order or 3 small orders, it’s the same shit.

        People are so swept up in ‘kindness and support’ (internet circlejerking), they think that the fact you inconvenienced some 17 year old, representing a massive corporation, as a fuck you to the company that employs them, you’ve committed some moral sin against your fellow man.

        • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          the cashier

          Who is also the manager, making drinks, doing the fries because that bitch called in sick…

            • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              depends on the situation. otherwise good employee who rarely if ever is sick and works hard calls in about being unable to work? absolutely fine

              Person who i know knows exactly how many days a year over how many periods of absence it will take before HR get involved using it as a second pool of paid holiday days and leaving us high and dry to deal with the things she’s paid to help the team with then yeah, bitch

              her name was karen too…

              • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                Person who i know knows exactly how many days a year over how many periods of absence it will take before HR get involved using it as a second pool of paid holiday days

                This is a dick move if you don’t tell your coworkers how to exploit the loophole too, and a heroic act if you do.

        • neomachino@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          That worker doesn’t want to be there, that’s likely one of 3 jobs they need to barely scrape by.

          You holding them up from doing other tasks they need to do to keep a job that barely feeds them is doing nothing but making their day a little harder. It affects the company 0%. The company is faceless and doesn’t care how much you abuse the worker bees as long as they get your money.

          I don’t know what the answer is aside from not patronizing the company at all, but I know that’s not it.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            The company is faceless and doesn’t care how much you abuse the worker bees as long as they get your money.

            Hey now, sometimes the company employs security that’s extremely bored, incredibly racist, and looking for a low income punching bag to hassle.

          • Lag@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            If the company is always too busy, they will need to hire more workers or the existing ones will leave.

            • neomachino@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              I highly doubt it, if the store is too busy they’ll likely either do nothing because why would they or if it’s really bad add some robots who can handle the workload so they can get rid of those pesky employees.

              In the past few years almost all of the fast food places in the closest plaza to me have been working on a skeleton crew. Lines wrapped around the building, 2 miserable employees, upset customers, but the money is still coming in.

              Most people can’t just leave their job, even a days wage can crush a lot of people.

    • purplemonkeymad@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I don’t know about other places but they haven’t had a counter for years round here. They have big screens that you go up to to order and pay, then you get a number and pick it up when called. Even if you wanted to do this, no one is going to listen to you trying to order at the kitchen.

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Entirely different country, but they still have a counter in addition to the screens; the counter is for when you want to pay cash

  • yoshisaur@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    man, and i was gonna switch to graphene this christmas. if every app can just ban my OS, i might have to rethink this. i would use the website but they restrict so many things to apps now…

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Use a browser like Native Alpha or Hermit, which present a website like an app.

      And if you use Bitwarden/Vaultwarden for your passwords, it can be pretty seamless.

    • Sips'@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      TBF, this is the first time I’ve encountered an app not working - and it was before this. It’s just because of Google push towards monopoly via their Play Integrity API that’s ruining this.

      • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        play “integrity” should be considered malware, any program that deliberately does something the user doesn’t want it to should.

    • Im_old@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I was about to switch bank because for a few days my current one (inadvertently) blocked it on grapheneOS. We sent them a few emails and they fixed in less than a week.

      • A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I use a small local credit union that doesn’t appear on their supported list. It’s literally the only thing holding me back, I’m tempted to say fuck it anyway. But I wonder if it might work anyway…

    • The 8232 Project@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Well, switching to GrapheneOS shows that you don’t care what those companies do and that you’re willing to fight. It means those companies lose one more customer.

  • Sticky Fedi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    So, uh, the next version of GrapheneOS will probably come with some Android OS version spoofing tech that solves this - if there isn’t something on F-Droid already.

    • Sips'@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      No it won’t. Or at least they said on BlueSky that if there had been a work around for this they would have solved it already.

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I mean remote attestation is cryptographically secure (unless there’s some temp implementation vulnerability).

  • SnotBubble@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Would not updating Revolut keep the app compatible as long as you don’t sign out?

    If so, don’t update the app and write down the build number of the last app version which worked on GrapheneOS. That way you would have a bit more time to sort things out.

    • Andrew@mnstdn.monster
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      They constantly force you to update or the app won’t work. I was already having issues with Revolut on GrapheneOS so I just closed my account and switched to Wise. The Revolut app was a bloated mess anyway.

      • Sips'@slrpnk.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yupp thinking about doing the same, but want to wait a little to see if wise decides to do the same…

  • penquin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Webapps everything you can like I do with Firefox and ublock origin. Fuck these assholes.

    • Mike@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Unfortunately, this is probably because of the apps started using the Play Integrity API, which is a hardware-based attestation and can only be faked in two ways that GrapheneOS isn’t interested in:

      • you can fake an older device that didn’t support hardware attestation yet, or had a broken implementation
      • or you can try getting leaked vendor keys and emulate the crypto with those until they get revoked
  • Anivia@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Time to switch away from Auth I guess. Not even using GrapheneOS cause I have a Samsung phone, but this is not acceptable

    • 4lan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      It’s crazy how they can just do illegal things because they have so much money…

      Do I own my phone or not??

        • theroff@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Graphene shills have been banging on this point for donkey’s ages. Reality is that many people use phones that are out of OEM support and many OEM ROMs are bundled with questionable software (Oppo, Samsung etc.) There are some decent criticisms to be made about LineageOS, but others to be made about Grapheme, like its Google-suggestive configurations, which is quite bad for security and privacy. Graphene says this is all optional and not part of the OS, but doesn’t include any equivalent F-Droid installer.

          • DoeJohn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Yeah. As much as I love GrapheneOS and all the security work, sometimes I feel like their “ideal” setup is to just install GrapheneOS on the latest Pixel phone and use only the 5 or so built in apps, as everything else is insecure, brings additional code baggage and can introduce flaws. I don’t think anyone can live like that.

      • c1a5s1c@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        copy that - thanks for the hint. honestly, if it doesn’t work in the future, I’ll probs just cancel my account with them

    • Jyek@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      This has very little to do with Google. Custom OS’s in general are being restricted by these apps, not Graphene in particular. All custom OS’s and root access devices are inherently less secure, even if they are privacy focused OS’s.

      In IT this is called a zero trust. You don’t trust anything you cannot verify yourself. And a user installed OS is not something anyone can verify other than the installing user. Obviously for your own security you have your own zero trust policy if you are using something like Graphene, but these companies aren’t making it more secure for you as a user, they’re covering their asses in case there are holes in security they cannot account for.

      • lacaio da inquisição@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I had Custom OSs installed before. My bank works fine, but there are apps that require Google Apps. I’d say that’s got pretty much to do with Google.

        • Jyek@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          You’re implying that Google is causing these apps to not support custom OSs. But it’s literally not true. These apps are just not supporting custom OSs because their businesses don’t want to support non-standard platforms for security purposes. Tons of banks do not support custom OSs. It has nothing to do with Google and everything to do with not trusting the user which is 100% the correct approach for cyber security.

          • lacaio da inquisição@lemmy.eco.br
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Got it. So it’s something similar to latest security proposals like not letting me download files on Windows because they are not normally downloaded. Or visiting a website with self signed certificates. So it’s more secure.

            The apps complain: “You need Google Play services to use this app”.

            So it’s about security. Right. What kind of security does McDonaldss need? Does it need security for their coupons?

            Besides that, I thought payment gateway provided very good security by themselves.

            But let’s steer from what happens on mainstream apps a little.

            Isn’t Google Wallet or Online payments insecure too? Don’t they have tons security failures also? Human security failures, like if someone robs my phone and my info they would have access to my money?

            Google and the smartphone industry employ accelerometers and other methods to make sure robbers can’t get to the system. They admit themselves that the systems aren’t safe and they’re working on AI and electronic methods to avoid access to sensitive information.

            Is this the security you’re talking about? Maybe we should just steer the industry another way, like those Custom OSs do. Alternatives aren’t security potential threats. They’re the solution for the problem.

            Making a monopoly based on making it “safe” isn’t secure at all.

            • Jyek@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              It’s not for your security. It’s for the company’s security. You’re really dense you know that. This is not about you and it’s not about Google. What I’m saying is, people suck ass. So to protect themselves from people sucking ass, they restrict access to their system to their terms. Completely fair if you ask me.

              You can go cry Google bad all you want. I might even agree Google is bad. But this is not a Google thing. It’s an IT security thing. The banks and MFA providers are security first businesses. They will make the decision that protect them first and it makes sense for them to do so. If you owned a bank, there is a high likelihood you would make similar decisions that end users don’t quite understand.

              As far as McDonald’s is concerned, who the fuck knows what their developers are doing. That app is trash anyways.

              • ganymede@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                perhaps dial back the attitude a bit there? if you think you know better than someone (even if you’re wrong), then you should have no trouble kindly educating instead of insulting them.

                you may also wish to revisit your highly questionable claim that graphene properly configured on pixel is less secure than stock rom on some random android device.

                • Jyek@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  It’s not questionable at all to assume that a user rooting and installing their own OS is a security risk. That’s the entire premise of zero trust. I’m sure Graphene OS is secure and better for user privacy when configured properly. But you can’t trust that an end user will configure it properly. That’s what I am saying and have been saying since the first message. You can’t trust the user to be security minded. Ultimately, the best thing you can do as a developer or a business is support a known quantity of software and hardware configurations and that likely means only supporting OEM installed ROMs.