So far, I’ve come across these three terms:

  • Princeton (John von Neumann) architecture
  • Harvard architecture
  • Modified Harvard architecture

Is that it? What about some of the other alternatives?

  • SinAdjetivos@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Depends how far you stretch the definition. Those listed are a subset of RASP machine models, which are a subset of turing machines, which is a subset of finite state machines, but as far as “general purpose computing architectures” that’s about it as far as I’m aware… Unless you get into weird application specific stuff like differentiable neural computers.

    You could also go the other way and look at how the basic principles of those architectures get expanded on IE Von Neumann -> ARM -> Advanced Microcontroller Bus Architecture (AMBA) -> Advanced eXtensible Interface (AXI) -> etc.

    • victoitor@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Would a quantum computer count as a finite state machine? If not, wouldn’t it be an example of something different?

  • maxcorbetti@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Neuromorphics are a big one that will soon have a large presence. This also sort of encompasses tensor units and other AI specific hardwares. Maybe take a look at ASICs and unconventional computing.