https://github.com/GloriousEggroll/ULWGL

From the github:

WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR OTHER LAUNCHERS (lutris/bottles/heroic/legendary,etc):

  • everyone can use + contribute to the same protonfixes, no more managing individual install scripts per launcher
  • everyone can run their games through proton just like a native steam game
  • no steam or steam binaries required
  • a unified online database of game fixes (protonfixes)
  • firecat@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    My worry is Valve will look at the project and shut it down. Remember, Valve doesn’t care about your Linux, it only cares about money. Not having users on their Client side platform means less revenue and less ads to show.

    • cjf@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      This doesn’t affect valve at all though. It’s borrowing their tech that they’ve made open source, and figuring out how to use it elsewhere outside of steam.

      Actually, it’ll benefit them. More eyes are on proton and any fix will benefit everyone, including games played via steam.

      • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s really up to the corporation whether they think it will benefit them. I agree that Valve has so far not been hostile toward GE, and it looks like proton has a very permissive license, but if it were any other digital storefront, doing anything to allow users to consume your content without using your storefront would be seen as at attack on their bottom line.

        I’m actually curious how this new standard would potentially benefit other storefronts who haven’t natively supported Linux yet. If it’s going to make things easier for existing open source launchers, then it would also make things easier for competing launchers. I know as a consumer, I want GOG, Epic, EA, etc. supporting Linux, but does valve? I don’t know, maybe, maybe not. On the one hand, maybe they don’t want competition in their niche space, on the other hand, maybe they’ll do anything to take marketshare from msft.

        • Kaldo@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Valve’s Proton is open source but is it also free to use and distribute in commercial software? Cuz if so, there’d be nothing stopping GOG or Epic from implementing it already, they don’t need this project at all

          • Patch@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Valve’s Proton is open source but is it also free to use and distribute in commercial software?

            Yes.

            Valve’s Proton code is licensed under the BSD licence, which is a “do anything you like with this code” licence.

            Wine code is under the LGPL. You can ship this in commercial software as long as you “make the source code available” (which, assuming the distributor isn’t modifying the Wine code further, can be achieved by just linking people back to the main Wine project code repository).

            DXVK is licensed under zlib, which is functionally the same as the BSD licence.

          • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            Someone else already explained the licenses, but to your second point, yes, nothing stops any other launcher from using proton, which is what all the other open source launchers do. And yes, no one “needs” this project, just like we don’t “need” any standards for anything, but it could make things a lot cleaner and easier to support.

    • seang96@spgrn.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Valve also worries about relying on Microsoft. They want people to transition to Linux since it’s open and no corporation can go “all games have to go through my store for 30% commission!” The proton fixes that these clients make Valve can also probably utilize to also make and I’m sure the devs for these also contribute to proton so it’s a win for everyone.

      • firecat@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        “Third party software included and respected byproducts of Valve’s proprietary”

        Legit doesn’t mean you own all the code.

        • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Afaik proton is BSD-3, and everything else important is part of wine which is LGPL. Sure, valve can be hostile if they choose, but they haven’t given themselves the legal tools to do much.

          • firecat@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            You’re the troll if you can’t explain why no one owns all the code. You can’t even accept the lawsuits that the people of America brought against to Valve Corporation.

            Dont talk like you have anything worthwhile going when you refuse to acknowledge their crimes.

              • firecat@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                10 months ago

                You cannot download all the code, try it bitch i know you can’t because i also cant. Next time confirm your conspiracy theory first.

            • prole@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              if you can’t explain why no one owns all the code.

              Is this the first time you’re hearing about open source software?