• gullible@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    As always, it’s hard to determine what is AI and what is a filter. The guy whose entire face was edited to be flat and tilted 10 degrees toward the camera got me. That said, 8/10. The first two clued me into what the author was going for and I got the rest right.

  • Neato@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Well since it’s a bunch of real faces combined it’s not that difficult to make a realistic face.

    • Chozo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      That’s not how modern AI image generation works. AI no longer just mix-and-matches various assets from a library. It’s creating its own unique images based on what it knows about the shapes and colors of things its been trained on.

    • veee@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s perfectly ok to admit you got 0/10. No judgement here!

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I got the same score, though I got the dark haired woman. I don’t remember the one I missed instead.

      I feel like trying to identify unedited images and AI isn’t as hard, but when they’re edited it gives many of the same details that AI generated ones have. Mostly it’s the smoothing out of details. This could be just that the AI was trained on a dataset pulled from images available online (which are almost all edited to some extent) or just because the way it generates it makes details not quite clear. Probably a little of both.

    • Chozo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yeah, one of them definitely had the fake, post-processed bokeh effect added to it that a lot of phones with “portrait mode” use. Which, to be completely fair, makes that technically an AI-generated image.

      I was looking for artifacts of AI generation, and I found them, but I’m still wrong. I can’t win.

  • flakpanzer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Got 6/10, for at least 2 pictures I looked at the outside corners of the eyes, if they match it’s likely AI, most real humans likely do not have symmetry there.

  • FaceDeer@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is the sort of thing that I like to send to people who assure me that “all AI generated art looks wrong” or whatever.

    No, the AI generated art that looks wrong is the only AI generated art that you notice. The rest slips by.