You must log in or register to comment.
Shame I was few used it but I think it is interesting that people actually reporting issues and seems to be expected to fix.
I simply would just use a step down in security, that’s why I am using brave in first place. Oh don’t run my no script Firefox, oh don’t run on Librewolf. Guess I try brave now. Oh don’t work striked guess standard it is
Not to mention that people have telemetric on. Because I don’t think most that willing to have websites break for security would like telemetric on.
Yeah, that’s really flawed reasoning on their part. The sort of people who disable Brave’s telemetry (which cannot do anything more than promise privacy, even if true) are the sort of people who would use other enhanced privacy settings!
I’ve never had a site break due to this.
If you’re interested in a browser with strong fingerprinting protection out-of-the-box, I recommend the Mullvad browser
It’s desktop only tho
Brave is trash. Just use Firefox.
The same approach would make sense in Firefox too though. And as far as I know, Firefox’s equivalent option is still about:config-only anyway.
Librewolf, librewolf to be precise
I would never use a browser provided by a company that dabbles in cryptocurrencies. Would you entrust your privacy to Sam Bankman-Fried?
