• portuga@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 hours ago

      No. Just the same shit with less users. Let it grow (by the millions as lemmy is trying to convince us) and you’ll see. I say we get back to smoke signals

    • rational_lib@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Non-billionaire controlled so far. It’s a public benefit corporation, which is vulnerable to being Altmaned. Once it becomes valuable money will find a way.

      • psychothumbs@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 hours ago

        That’s where the federated angle comes in. Not quite there yet, but as the network grows the vulnerability to the original node getting taken over by a bad actor lessens.

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 hours ago

          A feature that makes it easier for their users to migrate to a competitor? Blockchain Capital invests $15M in BlueSky. Insert that Anakin / Padme meme:

          Anakin: Now that we’ve invested, let’s make that federation feature priority 0
          Padme: As in highest priority, right?
          Anakin:
          Padme: As in highest priority, right?

        • chaogomu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Is blue sky federated? I thought it was another closed garden. If slightly more open than Twitter.