President-elect Donald Trump stunned the Pentagon and the broader defense world by nominating Fox News host Pete Hegseth to serve as his defense secretary, tapping someone largely inexperienced and untested on the global stage to take over the world’s largest and most powerful military.

Archive link

  • WraithGear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    The military will be effective at what ever it’ll do. You should hope it maintains some sanity at least. Like a loaded gun won’t jam just because a crazy person picked it up.

      • WraithGear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Right…i think the metaphor train has derailed here.

        What possible action do you think the military could be ordered to do, that will harm its capability to wage war, and will not result in even more innocent people getting killed than the regular levels of evil? Or is this a ‘acceptable collateral damage as long as its not me’ type of thing?

          • WraithGear@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            10 days ago

            That sounds really bad. Apologies but if this is all sarcasm, that is lost on me. I got people arguing that Trump helping Isreal finish the genocide quickly with be good for the Palestinians who live through it, and so sarcasm is long dead.

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 days ago

              Let me be clear then: the US military is a force for evil and anything that weakens it is positive for the rest of the world.

              • WraithGear@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                10 days ago

                Ok… but to argue that to privatize war making to the lowest bidder sounds like the premise to a libertarian monkey paw nightmare. Like current mercenaries track record with human rights violations is…well poor would be an understatement. And what is the issue you have with NATO?

        • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          Disband 20% of it’s career leadership.

          Zero out pentagon funding.

          Withdraw from NATO.

          • WraithGear@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 days ago

            And this is what you are arguing that trump will do? Or should do? And you are aware of its full consequences?

            • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 days ago

              Withdrawing from NATO, I could see Trump entertaining that (wouldn’t actually happen).

              Fire a bunch of the top leadership? For sure. That would both be something Trump could “order the military to do,” as well as something he might do, and it would also harm the US military’s capability to wage war.

              Zero out Pentagon funding? Not possible for trump to do alone, but depending on the congressional make up, it could be done and would severely limit the ability of the US Military to wage war. They could even do it without affecting enlisted personnel enrollment. The Pentagon has their own funding 100% separate from military spending.

              Could also deny all future discretionary spending for the military/pentagon.