So i hope at least a few read the paper and assess their method
I did, which is what made question the journal’s quality for publishing something so easily picked apart.
My comment was honestly less for you than anyone else clicking through, to save them a click. This is “peer reviewed” only in the sense that the author paid $260 for a “publish review” because they couldn’t get into a reputable journal.
Thanks for the tip.
The internet page says “Potential predatory scholarly open-access journals”
So i hope at least a few read the paper and assess their method
I did, which is what made question the journal’s quality for publishing something so easily picked apart.
My comment was honestly less for you than anyone else clicking through, to save them a click. This is “peer reviewed” only in the sense that the author paid $260 for a “publish review” because they couldn’t get into a reputable journal.