• designatedhacker@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    “Notably, Google, Bing, and DuckDuckGo all have the same problems, and in many cases, Google performed better than Bing and DuckDuckGo by the researchers’ measures.”

    Click bait headline. I see they’re good at SEO themselves.

    • Wogi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yeah, DDG skips all the sponsored links but I generally find what I’m looking for faster on Google if I just skip half the page rather than trying to find the right incantation to bring up what I’m looking for on DDG.

      • 0110010001100010@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’ve tried, many times over the years, to use DDG and you are 100% spot-on. I find it damn-near impossible to find what I need without some deep voodoo magic to somehow craft the perfect query. It’s been a decade+ since I’ve gone to page 2 of a Google search. Using DDG I can be 3 or 4 pages deep before maybe finding the answer. There is SOOO much irrelevant stuff to filter through.

        It sucks, I don’t want to use Google, but there doesn’t seem to be a great alternative.

        • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          just use a !g if you don’t get what you want the first time on ddg and you’ll still get a proxied google search result.