I’m very curious of which distro users loves the most that they have it on their daily hardware?

  • bruhSoulz@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    I got arch cus its light af basically, id just install what i want/need myself

  • pnutzh4x0r@lemmy.ndlug.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    Over the course of the last 20 years, I’ve gone from Arch -> Void -> Pop!_OS -> Ubuntu, and that is what I use on all my machines (laptops, desktops, servers).

  • Rogue@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    Nobody has mentioned immutables yet?!

    I finally dipped my toes into trying a new distro over the summer and have been really impressed with Project Bluefin. All the familiarity of Gnome for existing Ubuntu or Debian users but with a completely hands off rolling update experience.

    The main drawbacks are the slight complexity of how the fuck to install stuff on an immutable system. In theory you use Homebrew for CLI apps and flatpak for GUI apps but I’m really not a fan of installing from sources other than the original dev.

    • Breadhax0r@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      Bazzite is immutable, it worked generally okay for me but I swapped back to mint because I had to use a smart card reader and getting it to work on an immutable was a royal pain

  • Libb@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    Debian (desktop) and Mint (laptop), because I don’t need to use the latest version of every app I use and because it works so well.

    If I had to chose a single one, it would be Debian but I don’t have to chose ;)

  • vinnymac@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    I use Arch for personal and gaming, Debian for self hosting and hacking, Alpine for containerized cloud deployments.

    • I use Arch for personal and gaming, Debian for self hosting and hacking, Alpine for containerized cloud deployments.

      Pretty much the same for me: bleeding-edge Arch for my workstation, rock-stable Debian for my server.

  • lancalot@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    Best Distro

    Needs dictate preferences. An objective assessment isn’t possible even on an individual level, as circumstances change over time. Linux Mint serves as a common starting point, with many users eventually ‘graduating’ to other distributions. The opposite is also true; many eventually return to low-maintenance distros like Linux Mint, preferring something that ‘just works’.

    I’m very curious of which distro users loves the most that they have it on their daily hardware?

    I daily drive secureblue.

    • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      I’m sorry but I can’t resist mentioning it. Manjaro implemented quite sus telemetry recently so you should keep it in mind when choosing and using it.

      • owenfromcanada@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        Good to know! I was considering switching back to Debian or Mint, maybe LMDE. I’ll look further into it. Thanks for the tip!

        • Kongar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          Try endeavoros and use flatpaks. That’s basically manjaro with the following differences:

          • current with the aur
          • doesn’t have a built in gui software installer
          • no modifications-it’s basically just arch with the things you would have probably installed
          • owenfromcanada@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            14 days ago

            I was thinking of switching away from Arch and back to something Debian-based. I’ve never been a big fan of flatpaks (I have a background of not having fast internet or much storage space, it’s just stuck with me) and I never used the AUR anyways.

            I mainly tried Manjaro to try the bleeding-edge life, and while I do enjoy having more up-to-date packages, I do miss being able to install DEB packages. I think I might try Debian testing and see how that goes.

            • Xavier Berthiaume@piaille.fr
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              14 days ago

              @owenfromcanada @Kongar

              I’ve effectively gone that route of moving away from Arch to Debian and although it hasn’t been without some minor inconveniences from not having the most up to date software, I’ve been really happy with the change. I try to avoid flatpaks and for the most part have been successful, with like 2 or 3 exceptions so even if you’re not much of a fan, I’d wager you’d be fine for the most part without them.

              • owenfromcanada@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                14 days ago

                Yeah, that’s my plan. I usually end up with a couple of flatpaks (or AppImages) for the things that I need up to date, but otherwise just go with most things from the repository.