To me it is chess. I know how the piece move but that is it.

  • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I know how chess pieces move, other than the rare en passant, but will lose to anyone willing to challenge me and I don’t think I could get much better than mediocre with any amount of practice. However, I got full marks on a Mensa IQ test so I’d say I’m intellingent in a way but with my mild autism, likely ADHD and lack of practical skills, it’s hard to tell. I have done lots of stupid decisions IRL, often repeatedly.

    Would I say I’m “smart”? Depends. Intelligent, probably. Wise, hell no.

    • Maalus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The answer to the “chess” thing is “yes, you will get better if you play it for long enough”. It’s a lot about pattern recognition and the things you’ve seen in the past. There are certain rules to follow that help a lot - but someone needs to teach them to you first. It’s like saying “I suck at crosswords, I will never be good at them” - yes you will, with enough done you’ll start to see repeating “crossword words” that keep being used over and over.

      Edit: also for the life thing - it’s the difference between wisdom and intelligence.

      • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        You’re probably right. My biggest flaw is that I fail to notice forks, guarded pieces and other obvious patterns, and don’t know any nuances in the general strategy other than “exposed king bad, having more pieces good, K>Q>R>N>B>P”.

    • ABCDE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      You have to study strategies, that’s how people get good. You won’t be a match for anyone read.