Private security footage is nothing new to criminal investigations, but two factors are rapidly changing the landscape: huge growth in the number of devices with cameras, and the fact that footage usually lands in a cloud server, rather than on a tape.

When a third party maintains the footage on the cloud, it gives police the ability to seek the images directly from the storage company, rather than from the resident or business owner who controls the recording device. In 2022, the Ring security company, owned by Amazon, admitted that it had provided audio and video from customer doorbells to police without user consent at least 11 times. The company cited “exigent circumstances.”

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20240116132800/https://www.themarshallproject.org/2024/01/13/police-video-surveillance-california

  • Tremble@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I love technology but I don’t ever see myself installing a camera in my house that connects to the internet like this. It’s literally big brother…

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I give my cam access to the internet when I travel. Outside of that it’s LAN only.

      Luckily most NAS’s have software that can capture it and you can back it up to the cloud encrypted.

      • oozynozh@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        do you mind sharing a basic explanation about your setup? i’m looking at doing something similar with TrueNAS and NextCloud.

  • PLAVAT🧿S@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I had one of those Vivent door to door folks walk up to me one day, garage open. I was polite enough but explained I had no interest in storing a video feed of my house on their servers as I’d like to do illegal things if I want. They assured me it was stored with “aes256 encryption” - which they expect most laymen to be wowed by - but what good is encryption if they own the keys and crumble to government requests?

  • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    The perks of being an electronic security installer and wiring up your own house with a real system with a dozen PoE cameras and a local NVR under your control only…😋

    Stay away from the Harry Homeowner cloud-connected lick-and-stick BestBuy bullshit.

    • disheveledWallaby@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Any closed circuit security systems, ones that aren’t cloud based will come with an NVR (like a DVR) that hosts your recordings locally. Most are wired but some support wireless as well. Generally more expensive but in my opinion worth it.

      My mom bought a simple setup for I think 3 or 400 dollars at Costco.

      INAL but law enforcement can still request or subpoena your video if they suspect a crime has been witnessed by your cameras AFAIK. But at least you’ll know about it.

  • FerociousPea@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Someone set off a bomb close to my house. Police asked me questions about it (time, what it sounded like, etc). They noticed I had security cameras and inquired what I had. The dumbfounded look when I said Ubiquiti (they’ve never heard of it) and that all footage was recorded locally on a hard drive. Like they didn’t understand what that meant - obviously they were looking for an answer such as “google” or “amazon” so they could just circumvent me.