• Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    If you are speaking about stock Linux mint Xfce, with the default kernal, mesa version etc., your support for very new hardware - Arrow lake, battlemage and RDNA 4 will be imperfect. In general, very new hardware (launched within the last 6 months) will not be supported properly because the lts kernel being used was written before these products were launched

      • Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        The ultra 7 is actually a good all rounder. Decent performance (well balanced between gaming and production workloads), good efficiency and good pricing with respect to the AMD options. AMD is of course better for pure productivity (9950x), pure gaming (7800x3d and the upcoming 9800x3d) and is better at the low end (7600, 7600x)

    • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Technically he or she has access to the AUR, but through website.^^ On a more serious note, one could install https://github.com/89luca89/distrobox and manager multiple package managers. Because each package manager is in a container, they do not interfere. I never used it, but imagine it like Flatpak, but actually using the package manager from the distribution (including access to AUR). And specific applications and programs can be “exported” to install them like a normal application, so you can access it with a single appname.

    • exu@feditown.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      One could compile pacman and all the build tools if they really wanted to.

  • GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    You can’t easilyy switch between different inages like on an atomic fedora system.

    Do you have to switch now? No.

  • SolidGrue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I mean…

    Steam? Maybe? I dunno, I don’t game but the Steam kids seem to prefer Arch. I’m sure they have their reasons.

    Practically? Probably nothing terribly significant.

    • myersguy@lemmy.simpl.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Reasons are usually just newest kernel/mesa/etc. Most of the time the difference is very small, and often inconsequential. However, every now and again there is a major development that might make it worth it (IE: The graphics pipeline that all but made dxvk-async obsolete)

    • phanto@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Steam and Lutris work well! I can game on XFCE Mint just fine. I actually have an easier time of it than on a number of distros, thanks to the combination of flatpaks and the Ubuntu base. But, I am not “the kids”.

    • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think “they prefer” Arch because a lot of them just bought a Steam Deck and that comes with Arch and it just works.

  • confusedwiseman@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    In my experience, not much, but I’m a marginally functional newbie. Mint manages things for you fairly nicely and has been the best, it just works with out messing with much/anything. (At least for my hardware)

    I managed to get gnome working smoothly on mint and have been happy with it. I started and returned here since I last ditched windows as a native OS.

    The only thing that has made me consider distro hopping from mint is AUR on arch and gnome, though I’ve been successful so far.

    Part of trying the distros that are more advanced and give you more explicit control and configuration is the sense of accomplishment and it makes you figure out how and why things work the way they do. It holistically builds your velocity in your understanding of Linux. (Or gnu whatever that nuance is).

    If your machine has enough resources it is super easy to host VMs of anything you want to try. You can try them all, and it won’t cost you anything but time!

    • Nilz@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      If you feel like you need/want software from AUR you should check out Distrobox. It can run any distro on top of your installation using Docker under the hood, but it tightly integrates into your system so with little effort you can run AUR programs from your launcher as if they were natively installed on your Mint.

  • thejevans@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    You can’t have your entire system configuration in a repository of plain text files, which has lots of advantages, but it’s not worth caring about unless you feel excited to get into it.

    • oxomoxo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Why not? Isn’t this the whole concept of Bash Script, Ansible, Terraform, etc… I mean it can be as simple as a git repo that pulls down an install script then syncs your dot files. What am I missing? If you’re referencing Nix, you can also have that on Mint.

      • thejevans@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah, I’m talking about not just Nix, but NixOS. Nix (the package manager) can do a lot, but NixOS + disko + home-manager can literally be all of the configuration for your machine from drive partitioning through to dot files. Throw in nixos-anywhere and impermanence and you can have an insane amount of control over all of your computers.

        Ansible, Terraform, Chef, etc. do have some overlap, but the main difference is that those tools iterate through the system modifying it piece by piece and NixOS is declarative.

        If something fails in some of my bigger Ansible playbooks, it could mean 30 minutes of just running through all the steps again. I could probably break it into sections, but then I have to worry about making sure they all get run when things get updated. In my NixOS install, it’s way faster, I can roll back to a previous state, and troubleshooting is way easier in my opinion.

  • 0x0@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Technically speaking: nothing really, provided you have time and skills.

    Except maybe not having access to NDA-ed binary blobs or something…

  • poo_22@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    With NixOS you can upgrade your entire OS and if you don’t like it roll it back like nothing ever happened. You can also replicate your entire machine by copying your configs over to another computer, running the install, and then copying over any files you have in your home folder and you will have reproduced your desktop.

    You can also very easily use a different version of a packaged app by adding an override in your config. This is useful if you want bleeding-edge features or if something is broken. Also every package is also a development environment, so you don’t have to worry about setting up a dev environment to hack on stuff.

  • superkret@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Nothing, at all.
    Some things you can’t do easily in Mint, like create snapshots automatically and boot into them when something breaks.
    But it’s all Linux and freely available software under the hood, and the lines between configuration, customization and forking your distro are blurry.