• eldain@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    This article is far too hypey. One dude has started this initiative and needs people to work on his concept to get it off the ground. I’m not opposed to a red-hat free immutable system, but this one is so far from maturity this article is selling a first drawing like an almost finished product. Remind me in two years how this went.

    • Justin@lemmy.kde.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      Harald, the main architect behind it is already running it as his daily driver. Many others (myself included) are already testing it in VMs and on spare hardware with only very minor papercut issues to be resolved.

    • Blaiz0r@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      99% of people don’t understand anything about Snaps except from thinking they’re worse than Flatpak

      • Blaiz0r@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 days ago

        Probably not the purpose of this distro but using snaps in this way are a massive benefit for embedded systems

    • qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      So you’re telling me that if snaps take off and become a standard there’s a good chance I’ll have to use them just to get my drivers? Now I hate them even more!

      • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 days ago

        No but you see the drivers will be (must be) approved by Canonical which surely makes things better :|

  • BRINGit34@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    I think gnome is working on the same sort of thing, read here.

    I’m glad to see both going for an immutable os with flatpaks. It’s so much more user friendly for the average person and if you are more technically inclined distrobox makes it a breeze to use it like a regular linux desktop.

    I hope both do well

  • Leaflet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    Makes sense that it includes snap given that KDE officially supports their apps packaged as snaps, unlike Gnome.

    • Justin@lemmy.kde.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      Yes it is an Arch base. Not sure on the apparmor stuff and snap is basically banned from the Arch repos so it’s relegated to the AUR which makes it a pain.

    • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      Supporting both snaps and apparmor above selinux would be disappointing to me. Snaps more so, I at least get why AppArmor has supporters

      • d-RLY?@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 days ago

        I am currently only on Linux on my Steam Deck and I do have two RPi’s (though I don’t actively use them) so I don’t have personal current knowledge of differences between Snap, Flatpak, and App Image beyond that A: Snap always brings up lots and lots of hate in comments and B: is from Canonical.

        But is it possible that they might choose to use Snap for having more program options due to Ubuntu being such a “mainstream” distro? I know lots and lots of programs do release Flatpaks, but are there more of them or does Snap have more? Real question since I am aware of how heated some threads get with folks being really “fuck Snap” or “it is fine.” Mostly just curious since I am more and more likely to move my main PC to Linux as my main OS after Windows 10 is dead.

        • Arrkk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          21 days ago

          Think of it as the Mac appstore VS the Windows App store. Mac apps (flatpak) are the same as desktop apps, but sandboxed, the store isn’t intrusive, and people found it convenient, so it was fine. Then the windows app store (snaps) launched and it did basically the same thing but slightly worse, except Microsoft (canonical) forced it down its users throats, so people hated it.

          Both camps are right, from a technical perspective, snaps are fine, but philosophically, it sucks, and the Linux community cares way more about the latter than the former, otherwise they’d all be running windows.

        • Anna@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          21 days ago

          Snap doesn’t just bring lots of hate in comments it also brings a lot of bloat in your system which is a big no in Linux community. Another thing is canonical is going out of their way to force snap. In Ubuntu even if you do apt install it is installing snap packages.

          I’m not sure if there are more snap packages than flatpaks or .deb/.rpm but most Linux users are competent enough to either add custom repos or follow simple build instructions to build from source.

          • TMP_NKcYUEoM7kXg4qYe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            21 days ago

            But flatpak also brings a lot of bloat. That’s the point of these 2 formats. You are trading bloat for portability.

            The question here is not which one but why not both[*]? Also the target audience for this distro doesn’t know how to add repos, that’s the point of it.

            [*] the answer is that Snap Store has had malware in it multiple times but that could imo be solved by a disclaimer

      • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        I don’t like Snap too, but it has some advantages over Flatpak. And unfortunately the most popular distribution still uses Snap. In example it is easier to create Snap packages and Flatpak does not support CLI only applicatoins, but Snap does (something like grep in example). Also some may like it more that Snap relies on AppArmor instead using the custom solution of Flatpak.

        All in all, its not like black and white which is better. I still wish only one of the formats would exist, because this is not the kind of fragmentation I wish to have. But both exist and the end user should decide which of them to kill.

        • SatyrSack@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          21 days ago

          Flatpak does not support CLI only applicatoins

          Where does that misinformation come from? That’s not the first time I’ve heard it. Was that actually true at one point?

          • shapis@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            21 days ago

            In think it comes from flathub not having many cli applications in it. I’d love to drop snaps for Flatpak only. But I can get so many snaps that aren’t on flathub it’s crazy.

        • JustMarkov@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          22 days ago

          the most popular distribution still uses Snap

          Ubuntu is the most popular? On server maybe, on desktop I doubt it.

          Flatpak does not support CLI only applicatoins

          It is not true. You can install Neovim as flatpak, for example.

          Also some may like it more that Snap relies on AppArmor instead using the custom solution of Flatpak.

          It only means, that on distros without AppArmor you get almost no sandboxing of snap applications.

          The only advantage snap has is the ability to package drivers as snaps. Other than that there’s simply no reason to choose proprietary-backed snap over flatpak.

          EDIT: Typos.

          • caden@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            21 days ago

            I am pretty sure Ubuntu is still far and away the most popular desktop distro. For servers I would have guessed it was something like RedHat/CentOS or possibly Debian.

    • tehn00bi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      What is so hated about snaps? I’ll admit I haven’t used Ubuntu since they started using snaps, but I don’t understand the hate about them in the Linux community.

    • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      Not all. Red Hat started this by naming their immutable distributions with “atomic” (but then not consistently…). Some people agreed, but not everyone.

      • priapus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        Atomic in software refers to an operation that cant be interrupted because it happens in one step. This one of the big selling points of atomic or immutable distros. Your system will not be left in a broken state by cancelling an update because updates do not take multiple steps, unlike traditional distros.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        It means a change either applied completely and successfully, or not at all (think “atomic transactions” in databases).

      • Deckweiss@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        How could you install anything or change any setting if it was truly immutable?

        Immutable OS makes sense in certain scenarios, but not in home computing.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          21 days ago

          Do a little research, dude… Do you think you’re the first person to have those questions/issues? That’s all been addressed.

          I’ve been on an atomic/immutable distro for a few months now (Bazzite), and the experience has been great.

    • Virkkunen@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      How is atomic less confusing? Immutable means that something doesn’t change, atomic means that it’s the size of an atom or has nuclear energy

      • priapus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        22 days ago

        Atomic in software refers to an operation that cannot be interrupted, like the updates in these distros. Immutable is a more confusing term, as it leads users to believe that cannot control parts of the system, when in reality these distros still have tools to do so.

        • dustyData@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 days ago

          Settings live in user space. Software exist in containers like AppImage, Flatpak or Distrobox. If something need deep system integration, they can be layered on top of the system in the user layer. Immutable does NOT mean less control. Just exerting control over the system in a different, usually more systematic, automatic and deterministic way.

          • Deckweiss@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            22 days ago

            Ah yes, the immutable OS, except for all of the various mutable parts.

            We should totally not call it anything less confusing.

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              21 days ago

              It’s not confusing at all… How is this any more confusing than:

              Flatpak - they’re not literally flat…

              Snap - I’ve never seen or heard any evidence of something snapping by any definition of the word I’m aware of.

              Dolphin - what the fuck is this, no sea life whatsoever!

              Kate - this is a text editor, not a person.

              Distrobox - not in an actual box.

              etc.

              • Deckweiss@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                21 days ago

                The main difference to your examples is that an “immutable OS” is in fact mutable, while none of your examples describe themselves with an adjective that is contradicting with their function/inner workings.

                Flatpak is a pretty good name, because it makes software flat in the sense that it avoids having a (tall) dependency tree.

                • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  18 days ago

                  I installed Bottles, but was disappointed when it didn’t actually have anything to do with bottles.

                  If you think every name of every product, etc., is going to be literal… you’re gonna have a tough time in life.

      • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        Immutable does not mean “not changing”, but rather that you don’t have the rights to change. If you take the immutable option away, then its changing again, like when you update your system. People who have a problem with the term say, “see its not immutable, the term is a lie!”. Which I kind of agree, but somewhat conflicted.

        Atomic is an attempt to create a new “meaning” with a word, that cannot be misunderstood. Its trying to avoid the situation of “Free” in example. But I don’t like the term Atomic either, because it just suggest to me that everything is split into many little parts and is not self explanatory like Immutable. I’m conflicted here too.

        I’m always conflicted.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 days ago

        It’s not semantics, they are two different things.

        And to your edit… Are you upset that there are two different words that mean two different things? I don’t understand.

        they decided to create a bigger confusion by giving another word a completely different and exclusive meaning

        Isn’t this just how words work…?

    • moonpiedumplings@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      I disagree, because they are not the same thing.

      Immutable means read only root.

      Atomic means that updates are done in a snapshotted manner somehow. It usually means that if an update fails, your system is not in a half working state, but instead will be reverted to the last working state, and that updates are all or nothing.

      I create a btrfs snapshot before updates on my Arch Linux system. This is atomic, but not immutable.*

      There is also “image based” which distros like ublue (immutable, atomic) are, but Nixos (also immutable and atomic) are not.

      *only really before big updates tbh, but I know some people do configure snapshits before all updates.

    • Lemmchen@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      If it’s only there like in KDE Neon, I’m fine with it. I don’t want any of my distro apps to come as Snaps though.

      • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 days ago

        Yeah, Flatpak is far better. The most glaring issue: Canonical hosts the only Snap backend, you can’t host it yourself. Flatpak on the other hand is fully open.

        Don’t introduce proprietary crap just so companies can profit off of it.

        • TMP_NKcYUEoM7kXg4qYe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          21 days ago

          Don’t introduce proprietary crap just so companies can profit off of it.

          I agree but I think it’s the user who should be able to make the informed choice (ie. during installation)

            • TMP_NKcYUEoM7kXg4qYe@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              20 days ago

              This is a stupid argument. In FSF’s eyes even having nonfree repository (ie. for drivers) is bad so this is completely irrelevant for anyone considering flatpak or snap. Both have nonfree stuff in there.

              • JustMarkov@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                20 days ago

                Both have nonfree stuff in there.

                But flatpak’s backend is open source and self-hostable, while snap’s is proprietary and not self-hostable. Flatpak is the lesser of evils from this point of view.

          • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            21 days ago

            Honestly, why enable this kind of behavior in any way? Any user is free to make an informed choice by installing it themselves.

            We all know how this goes. Once a critical mass is reached, enshittification begins to milk everything dry. By making it an installer option, you’re legitimizing it and supporting a worse future for the Linux desktop.

            • TMP_NKcYUEoM7kXg4qYe@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              20 days ago

              Ok but KDE has official Snap packages so they already are “legitimizing it”. Also snap won’t be able to entshittify anything. Snapd is still open source, so you can just repackage the software for different package system.

              • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                19 days ago

                My guy. There is no open backend for Snap. If Ubuntu enshittifies Snap, nobody can host an alternate backend for them. How does the client being open source help you?

  • dustyData@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    Maybe they’ll fix the sddm custom theming? It’s currently broken on all immutables and doesn’t allow custom themes.

    • Justin@lemmy.kde.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      Yeah that’s certainly annoying but still relying on SDDM to solve this. There is a movement to see if we can import SDDM into the KDE umbrella but it’s a bit stalled at the moment.

  • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    Ooo damn that sounds exactly what I’d like to try.

    On the other hand I feel like I’m too old for this shit. My system works fine, I understand everything, and things rarely break and never in an unrecoverable way.

    • Karna@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      The beauty/advantage of Linux Eco-system is one can pick and choose based on his/her preferences.

  • penquin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    Man, I almost want to say “I love it”. Remove the “snap” and the “immutable” and I’m all in.
    Almost there 🤏🏽

    • dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      There’s KDE Neon already. The whole point of this distribution is the atomic immutable part.

        • dustyData@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          21 days ago

          Then just install KDE in your Arch install. Or use endeavorOS with KDE, or any other Arch based OS with KDE. Don’t be dismissive of other people’s interests.

          • penquin@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            21 days ago

            Not being dismissive, just expressing an interest in something different.

    • TriflingToad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      I don’t understand why people want immutable. I don’t know all that much about Linux but on my Steamdeck it keeps getting in the way anytime I try to do anything

      • penquin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        Some people like it, I don’t like and will never mess with it. I do understand why some folks like it. It’s basically for those who want a system that’ll never break to a point where they can’t access their data. I just can’t use it

      • UNY0N@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        You certainly have to learn new ways of doing things when you want to tinker, but they are basically UNBREAKABLE, which is my main plus point. I’m busy, I need my PC to be reliable. I don’t want to have to troubleshoot stuff just to keep it up and running.

        If I had more time I would really enjoy the tinkering, but I don’t so I need my distro just work.

      • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        Immutable is fantastic in theory. Where it falls apart is having to basically rebuild the whole distro every time you want to make a change. It should be there your base distro is immutable, then any extra changes go on an additional mutable layer but that would be difficult to set up. (You’d need a package manager like Nixos or something.)

        • dustyData@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 days ago

          your base distro is immutable, then any extra changes go on an additional mutable layer

          That is exactly how OsTree and other layering solutions work. Only Nix requires a whole distro rebuild.

          • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            22 days ago

            It isn’t, though. Package layering modifies the install itself. See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-silverblue/getting-started/#_flatpak_command_line

            The big problem with the way ostree works is that installing things has side effects. Every item you install with ostree makes all future items slower to install, including regular os updates. This is a significant flaw in the way they designed it and really makes immutable oses less attractive.

            • dustyData@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              21 days ago

              It’s not a flaw. Ostree is a last resort, you should be using containerized software. Layering a package should only be done when strictly necessary and not as the regular way to manage packages. If you need an overtly customized system, you use Nix or universal blue to design your new system declaratively and create your custom image.

              • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                20 days ago

                That is a flaw. Flatpak is great where it works but Flatpak doesn’t solve all problems, neither does any one solution except os level modification. It can be a last resort by it should be a last resort that works. The layering system could be put together such that you don’t get side effects of installing packages like that. It might be tough to fix but that doesn’t make it not a flaw.

                • dustyData@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  19 days ago

                  Please remember that no one is taking anything away from you. If you don’t like it, you don’t have to use it. Traditional package managing isn’t going away any time soon. You are safe. Others can have their preferred tech, and you don’t have to like it. It’s ok to have different tastes.

          • Darohan@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            22 days ago

            And even then with nixos-rebuild switch you won’t really notice that you’re “rebuilding” anything

      • capital@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        I personally don’t tinker much with the OS. I want it to stay out of the way and let me do things. In the case of Bazzite, everything I need for gaming is just there and works without me lifting a finger.

        I like the safety and simplicity immutables bring.

        If I’m doing something out of the ordinary, a temporary container usually suffices.

        It’s really made the switch from Windows as a daily driver much easier.