I can’t get a good answer for this as Google is thinking I’m talking just solely on the driver. I’m including passengers who don’t. I’ve seen PSAs that tell you the dangers you pose for others as well when you don’t wear a seatbelt. So if you don’t wear a seatbelt and that results in someone being killed could you not wearing a seatbelt mean you get a manslaughter charge?

  • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.techEnglish
    0·
    24 days ago

    It’s easy. You decided to drive a vehicle, you’re at fault, it’s your job to watch out for pedestrians. If you can’t stop in time, you’re moving too fast. If your vehicle is so large that it kills them instead of simply hurting them (see - large trucks with huge grills instead of safer lower fronts), then you’re at fault 100% because you chose an unsafe vehicle. If you can’t see them because it was at night, still I don’t care, that was on you, you should be able to see them. Feel free to argue it in court, that’s what they’re there for, but duty should on the driver to prove that, they were the one operating the heavy machinery. If that worries you or makes you feel emotions then good. You should feel nervous when you drive a vehicle, it’s quite literally heavy machinery that you’re hurtling forward at 60mph. You’re responsible for it.

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.techEnglish
        0·
        23 days ago

        Fine, you want me to be explicit?

        If you’re driving and I’ll jump onto the road right in front of you, will you still be at fault?

        Yes. I would be at fault. I’m the one driving a hunk of metal that is capable of easily killing people, you could be drunk, delirious, it doesn’t matter. It’s on me.

        Where in the world would that be the case?

        I say everywhere.

        If I come to a factory and stick my hand into a wood chipper that someone was operating and then say “whoever the hell was operating this 5 thousand pound hunk of steel should be at fault now!”

        Irrelevant. Streets are not supposed to be deathtraps. No one deserves to die simply by wandering into the street. Again, drunk, delirious, or a child - none of them deserve to die because they wandered into the street.

        If someone robbed you, think about it this way - if you hadn’t been there, none of it would have happened.

        Again, victim blaming. It is not the victims fault. It doesn’t matter that they were there, if they had 100 sticking out of their pocket. Still robbery. It doesn’t matter if a woman is revealing “too much”. Still rape. It doesn’t matter why a person was in the street. They’re still dead.

        If you don’t appreciate what you’re capable of when you’re driving, then you shouldn’t be driving.