I want to buy a new car, but it needs to be privacy friendly. Sadly you cannot really buy any new Car that is.

Has anybody any experience on making your modern car not phone home to its company, by removing the hardware it uses to do?

  • Tzeentch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Your best bet is to find a car where its easiest to disable the antenna/cellular modem for, so look for a car that has a fuse for the DCM(digital communications module) you can pull, as having it be a fuse means you can readily reconnect it should you need to, try to find its schematic online, or find the repair manual for the car or use a car maintenance program,

    Apparently its also possible to call the car company and ask for an opt out when serviced,

    I vaguely remember some people experimenting with replacing the head unit with aftermarket ones, but no idea how well that would actually go in practice

    • Lemonparty@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I vaguely remember some people experimenting with replacing the head unit with aftermarket ones, but no idea how well that would actually go in practice

      This varies wildly from manufacturer to manufacturer and even year to year. For example, GM cars used to route damn near everything through the entertainment unit, so that was your central computer. Cell antenna, on star control panel, every that phoned home. That was as recently as mid 2010s. It also led to hilarious problems where a relatively simple issue like an OnStar button not working well required a complete replacement of the stereo unit (which was $8k or so in parts and labor). Now that instrument clusters are doing more while also getting more diagnostic and digital, things are transitioning to a more centralized computing system somewhere else. This can make it easier OR more difficult to get around, depends on design.

      For other brands it’s borderline impossible to even use an aftermarket system. Mazdas for example the entire infotainment system relies on itself. There’s nowhere to even put a traditional aftermarket. I’m sure it’s possible, but the design of the interior is completely based around the infotainment unit.

  • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    While this seems like a great plan; I wouldn’t put it past manufacturers to throw an error message and disable the vehicle for ‘safety’ when it detects a missing network connection for an extended period and/or disabled hardware during self-test.

    I hate this dystopian hellscape :(

    • 0xtero@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      When I was last working in the automotive industry about two decades ago, a lot of effort was being put into protecting BIOS on diagnostic laptops, so that only “authentic” manufacturer diagnostic tools could be used to service the vehicles.

      Pretty sure that development has continued.

  • Reality Suit@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I am never buying a new car again. It will be hard, but I’m only buying old cars and repairing them. Not sure what to do about fuel when that stops. I Not sure about how to deal with a lot in the future, but I’m going to keep trying.

    • admiralteal@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Fortunately(?) the planet will have no future if it continues to be the case that basically everyone needs their own personal automobile to function in it.

    • bluGill@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      You can have good luck just by buying 10 year old cars - they might have connectivity, but the it will be to a cell/network standard that no longer exists and so for practical purposes the car cannot connect to anything.

      • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        3G still exists exactly for monitoring services, just not for consumer use.

        Milions (billions?) of remote monitoring devices rely on it, like oil fields, water systems, gas systems, etc.

        I’m not sure if the automotive systems fall into that, but I could see the manufacturers making sure they were.

        I have a vehicle with 3G that always has 5 bars, even when my phone has little or none. Kind of says a lot about the QOS the automotive industry gets.

      • Reality Suit@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        I have thought about something like that. Maybe getting an early model EV and maintaining it. I love the idea of electric vehicles, but they’ve just always been expensive. Cost is also the reason I have never bought a new vehicle in my life as well.

  • SheeEttin@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Probably, but exactly what you do would depend on your exact model. I would get the technical service manual for your vehicle, find the part about replacing that module, and follow the directions to remove it.

  • 0xtero@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Yeah, that’ll most likely disable the car / limit it. They often have anti-tamper detection in critical ECUs as well.

    • PaddleMaster@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Your comment makes me wonder if one could get around AT by installing faraday cages around where the chips are.

      I block telemetry on my IoT devices and they still work. I’m curious if cars would be bricked if they couldn’t call home, or if you could selectively allow certain messages through.

  • guyrocket@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    If you wrap your whole car with aluminum foil then the signal can’t get out. Be sure there are NO GAPS!

  • Scott@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Speaking as someone who worked for a corporate auto maker, it won’t be an easy task since they try to make it as difficult as possible to disable online activation if even providing the ability at all.

    The only real solution is pulling the head unit and trying to find any modem and desolder it, which who knows if it would function as it had before hand since everything is integrated.

    It will also hurt resale value.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Or just put a power test attentuator on the antenna output.

      It essentially absorbs the RF from the antenna and radiates it as heat. Since cell is pretty low power (1/2 watt max, IIRC), and a cell radio will stop trying to transmit after a while (though it will try again), I don’t think it would cause any problems.

      But I’m not an RF engineer.

    • ⲇⲅⲇ@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      When I worked on auto-maker on the head units, they were integrated on the chip, the ones that had a sim slot where you can insert and extract it were the ones for development. Recent cars, their GPS and screen media menus uses the Linux inside the modem chip.

        • ⲇⲅⲇ@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Unless you get an expensive car, I think they do that to reduce expenses. Expensive cars have dedicated CPU for that, but they still communicate with the head unit for online data.