• penquin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        I see what you mean. I did mean both, and I should have made it clearer. Sorry. Fixed it

      • dezmd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 days ago

        In the name of even dumber stupid internet arguments, it was. Data loss along with the price paid was an obvious inference.

          • dezmd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            21 days ago

            And yet the entire context is discussing an expensive SSD that would go bad, inherently implying data loss as part of the inferred outcomes. Not a blender or a crock pot or the LCD display of a 1997 Honda Civic radio.

            • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              21 days ago

              It’s the wrong explicit emphasis though. Faced with a bad 8tb drive my primary concern would likely be the data loss. It’s pretty well known these drives have a five year warranty as well, so if it were bricked even, you’d likely be able to get the money back / drive replaced.