• ryannathans@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I would assume because the whole model of encrypting your drives and installing bootloaders doesn’t blend well with the flatpak sandbox

    • Lemongrab@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 hours ago

      You can give a Flatpak the necessary permissions to modify disks. All the permissions needed by Veracrypt could be granted.

      • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 hours ago

        and then what’s the benefit of having veracrypt as a flatpak package? that it can be used with older dependencies? if so, is that a good thing to have for things that modify system startup?

        • JustMarkov@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 hours ago

          and then what’s the benefit of having veracrypt as a flatpak package?

          Flatpaks is a universal package format, it works almost everywhere. Also, there are immutable distros, that use flatpak as the default package format.

  • TechieDamien@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Those are two completely different things. It is like saying “why hammers not apples?” There is no logical answer, they are just two completely different things.