buckbanzai@infosec.pub to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoREPORT: Arm is sensationally canceling the license that allowed Qualcomm to make Snapdragon chips which power everything from Microsoft's Copilot+ PCs to Samsung's Galaxy smartphones and tabletswww.windowscentral.comexternal-linkmessage-square191linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkREPORT: Arm is sensationally canceling the license that allowed Qualcomm to make Snapdragon chips which power everything from Microsoft's Copilot+ PCs to Samsung's Galaxy smartphones and tabletswww.windowscentral.combuckbanzai@infosec.pub to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square191linkfedilink
minus-squareNeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-21 year ago Don’t just give the extortionists more money Or maybe they were just trying to pay a lot less money, and then they got caught at their little trick.
minus-square418_im_a_teapot@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoBy that logic every company would just run on linux. Free to use ≠ free to implement and support.
minus-squareNeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoYou have not read the article.
minus-squareiopq@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoDo you know how much money you have to pay to make a RISC V chip? Even less than that, since it’s free
minus-squaremannycalavera@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoIf it’s that’s easy / cheap then why have they not? This is a big ol’ game of bluff from both sides. So, according to you, Qualcomm should call their bluff?
minus-squareSaltySalamander@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoWonder how long that’d take, hmm?
minus-squarePetter1@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoDevelopment is never free, especially, if you have to build new knowhow and can not build upon the one they have built at development of ARM chips.
Or maybe they were just trying to pay a lot less money, and then they got caught at their little trick.
By that logic every company would just run on linux. Free to use ≠ free to implement and support.
You have not read the article.
Do you know how much money you have to pay to make a RISC V chip? Even less than that, since it’s free
If it’s that’s easy / cheap then why have they not?
This is a big ol’ game of bluff from both sides. So, according to you, Qualcomm should call their bluff?
They would need a new core design
Wonder how long that’d take, hmm?
Development is never free, especially, if you have to build new knowhow and can not build upon the one they have built at development of ARM chips.