I don’t mean BETTER. That’s a different conversation. I mean cooler.

An old CRT display was literally a small scale particle accelerator, firing angry electron beams at light speed towards the viewers, bent by an electromagnet that alternates at an ultra high frequency, stopped by a rounded rectangle of glowing phosphors.

If a CRT goes bad it can actually make people sick.

That’s just. Conceptually a lot COOLER than a modern LED panel, which really is just a bajillion very tiny lightbulbs.

  • 10_0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    CDs and DVDs, because ownership beats convenience when you can get them second hand for pennies on the pound

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Why are the kind of holograms made my lasers not cool anymore? They’re just on credit cards and currency now. I always thought those were awesome. There used to be a hologram museum in Chicago when I was a kid. We went up there a few times and I always insisted on going.

        The best ones were holograms of microscopes or telescopes and you could actually look through the eyepiece and see something through it!

    • FuzzyRedPanda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      And the technology has evolved that I can actually record and re-record to these plastic discs using lasers and it all fits inside a 1cm-tall drive that sits on my desk. And if the manufacturer uses high-quality materials, the disc will last hundreds of years.

      Also some discs I can then either ink-print or laser-print on the top of it? Simply amazing.

  • francisfordpoopola@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    This may not apply, (as I know I’m simply saying a commercial product got worse as it had revisions) but Jawbone’s first earbud/headset used a small rubber conductor to evaluate skull vibration for noise canceling ( and likely there was some ANC using incoming mic audio from external sources). They continued to include a rubber bumper but I think the device leaned more on incoming audio from mics rather than from the rubber bumper. The oldest device presented the best noise canceling even after 3 product changes. I used every version until they stopped making headsets. I miss my Jawbone. I still have my OG.

  • DumbAceDragon@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I used to be pretty into machine learning and AI generation circa 2018-ish. It used to be fun and surreal. Sites like artbreeder were a great novelty, and also a pretty good learning tool. Now that it’s “good” I feel that not only has a lot of the charm been lost, it’s become much easier for malicious actors to use it.

  • Dearth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    The original tv remote didn’t use batteries. It used sound. Giant clunky devices with large tactile buttons. Never runs out of batteries and still works if your kid tries to block the screen to keep you from turning it off

  • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Oh man…I have an entire ten page paper on the go about this topic and it just keeps growing. One day I’ll publish it in a blog or something, but for now it’s just me vomiting up my thoughts about mass market manufacturing and the loss of zeitgeist.

    The examples that I always use are a) Camera Lenses, b) Typewriters, and c) watches.

    Mechanical things age individually, developing a sort of Kami, or personality of their own. Camera lenses wear out differently, develop lens bokehs that are unique. Their apertures breath differently as they age No two old mechanical camera lenses are quite the same. Similarly to typewriters; usage creates individual characteristics, so much so that law enforcement can pinpoint a particular typewriter used in a ransom note.

    It’s something that we’ve lost in a mass produced world. And to me, that’s a loss of unimaginable proportions.

    Consider a pocket watch from the civil war, passed down from generation to generation because it was special both in craftsmanship and in connotation. Who the hell is passing their Apple Watch down from generation to generation? No one…because it’s just plastic and metal junk in two years. Or buying a table from Ikea versus buying one made bespoke by your neighbour down the street who wood works in his garage. Which of those is worthy of being an heirloom?

    If our things are in part what informs the future of our role in the zeitgeist, what do we have except for mounds of plastic scrap.

  • Shard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Slide open phones with a QWERTY keyboard. Those were the bomb.

    I wish someone would being those back

  • HexagonSun@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I was thinking the other day how much cooler flap displays at stations and airports were compared to modern displays.

    Such a nice interface between computer control and a purely mechanical display. Watching them update, flipping through all the variables to land on the right one, and then clearing was so cool.

    I miss the noise they made too. Haven’t seen one for like 20 years now.

  • nicerdicer@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    The technology behind telecommunication.

    Today everything happens inside your router, fast and silent. My father was a telecommunications engineer. When I was a amall boy (late 1980s) he once took me to his workplace (it was in the evening and he was supposed to troubleshoot). What today fits onto a few silicone chips inside a router took much more space back them.

    I was in a room that was filled with several wardsobe-sized cabinets. Inside there were hundreds of electro-mechanical relays that were in motion, spinning and clicking, each time someone in the city dialed a number (back then rotary phones were quite common). It was quite loud. There also was a phone receptor inside one of the cabinets where one could tap into an established connection, listening into the conversation two strage people had (it was for checking if a connectiion works).

    I still remeber the distinct “electrical” smell of that room (probably hazardous vapors from long forbidden cable insulation and other electrical components).

    So when you dialed a number at one place with your rotary phone, you were able to move some electro-mechanical parts at another place that could be located somewhere else around the globe (hence long distance calls).

    • Tattorack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Tell that to the furries. Every furry I know that has a VRChat avatar feels more at home with a VR headset strapped to their face.

    • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I generally can’t be arsed with online multiplayer – Just as a concept.

      But I made great memories with my cousins playing Wii/GameCube local multiplayer titles. Smash, Mario Kart, Sonic Adventure 2, et cetera.

      • psycotica0@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I have never played a game with random strangers ever. But! My brother and sister both live hours away from me (and each other), and we keep in touch by playing online co-op games every week.

        I have a group of friends that I have mostly kept in touch with by playing online games too.

        So I agree with what I think you meant, but I’m very glad online multiplayer exists in some form.

        • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I mean. All my friends who match my freak live 120Km+ away from me and so I have played online games with them.

          But man it’s just not the same as the experience of snacks, a beat up sofa, crowding around a television, yelling at each other, yanno?

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m biased because I’m building up a small collection, but radios were cooler when they were made of Bakelite.

    My modest collection:

    Also, I realize that digital tuning is more accurate, but there’s something I find very pleasant about turning a knob and the station suddenly comes in clearly. Just that little “aha” serotonin hit.

    • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Technology connections is the gent that inspired this thread. Was watching one of his videos about old camera flashes (LITERALLY TINY FLASHBANG GRENADES. WE USED TO USE FUCKING BOMBS TO TAKE PHOTOS IN THE DARK HOW FUCKING COOL IS THAT???) and figured “huh… There are a lot of old inventions that might suck to use but are conceptually really cool, aren’t there?”

      Fun fact, he’s in the fediverse! He’s @techconnectify@mas.to over on mastodon.

  • Bear@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Trains and railways are cooler and better than cars and highways. Imagine making everyone get their own personal vehicle, engine, tires, fuel, service, license, and insurance, just to watch them all crash into each other and die constantly.

    • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Trains aren’t old tech though. Just tech that got pushed out by auto-maker lobbying. In places (like Japan, or China, or parts of Europe) where they kept evolving they only got better.

    • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yes although I would argue cars and highways are just evolutions of horse carts on dirt roads, a way older technology than trains.

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Especially the interurban lines that built every American megacity. Small single driver electric trains (basically trolleys but designed to go faster than streetcars and ran on dedicated right of way outside of the city) they were a really efficient method of transporting people into cities, many allowed for flag stops (where a passenger would flag down the car anywhere along the tracks to stop so they could get on) and would run between cities, feeding from smaller towns into larger ones or just running between nearby cities.

      Unfortunately passenger railroad service has always been unprofitable. Until the 1960s most passenger services were largely paid for by lucrative mail contracts and would haul Railroad Post Offices, which were delicated cars with tiny postal sorting facilities in them that post workers would sort the incoming and outgoing mail on and pickup and drop off big bundles of mail at every stop and often even without stopping. Most interurban and trolley lines were largely real estate schemes where they’d buy comparatively cheap farm land, build a rail stop and possibly a few homes and businesses near the stop to sell for a tidy profit, then sell the rest of the land plot by plot now that the rail connection and other nearby homes and businesses made it far more valuable. This was even the tactic when building the transcontinental railroad, where the railroad companies built entire cities along the way.

      So simply put, railroad construction and operation is prohibitively expensive. On the other hand, if the US Federal Government matched their spending on highways for railroad expansion the cost of rail transport would probably blow the cost of driving or hiring a truck out of the water entirely

  • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Video games. Way back then there was imagination involved, and companies took risks. Nowadays every game seems to iterate on the same tired formula. The only recent entry I can think of that bucked this trend in the past few decades was maybe Portal, but there have been few to no other recent games that come to mind. Fight me.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      The imagination came from the limitations of the hardware.

      Computers today are too powerful for gaming. Its resulted all the famous studios racing to the bottom with graphics their primary and generally only concern, and everything else coming a distant second.

      But at least it left the door open for indie devs, whose lack of resources and experience are still capable of keeping that ember of imagination and innovation burning.

    • greedytacothief@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Not a fan of indie games are you?

      Baba is you, is a pretty original puzzle game. I’m not really into factorio, but it made tower defense cool again. There’s lots more that are weird and interesting like brigadore, airships conquer the skies, cruelty squad, superliminal.

      As far as I remember, portal was a mod or indie game that valve picked up because they thought the idea was really good. It was really good.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      You’re talking about the AAA space. Fuck those games. Play indies. There are so many creators carrying out the legacy of game development you’re talking about. Don’t buy the games directed by suits. Currently I’m playing Factorio: Space Age, which is great. I recently played Lorelie and the Laser Eyes, which is a really cool puzzle game where you’re actually going to want to write notes on paper, which feels very classic. There are so many out there, but you actually have to look because the don’t have the marketing budget of Ubisoft or EA.

    • BluesF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      What is the formula you’re talking about? Games are so diverse it’s pretty hard to see what single formula there could be that covers them all.