At a Senate hearing on AI’s impact on journalism, lawmakers backed media industry calls to make OpenAI and other tech companies pay to license news articles and other data used to train algorithms.

  • Eggyhead@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Regulating data collection on publications: congressional action is a go!

    Regulating data collection on consumers: everybody look the other way!

  • soulfirethewolf@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I think it would be better to enforce open, readable training sets that anyone can browse through to submit legal requests

  • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    The irony this is coming back to being a copyright extension issue in the year of our lord and savior, Steamboat Willie, is not lost on me.

  • Grimy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    “What would that even look like?” asks Sarah Kreps, who directs the Tech Policy Institute at Cornell University. “Requiring licensing data will be impractical, favor the big firms like OpenAI and Microsoft that have the resources to pay for these licenses, and create enormous costs for startup AI firms that could diversify the marketplace and guard against hegemonic domination and potential antitrust behavior of the big firms.”

    As our economy becomes more and more driven by AI, legislation like this will guarantee Microsoft and Google get to own it.