• randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s been an unsupportable business model from the beginning. Other than android, everything Google makes is easily replaceable by some other product. They don’t have a monopoly like any of their competition that will easily sustain them. I honestly don’t believe the majority of Google Engineers actually do anything innovative anymore as most of those people left the company when their pet projects were shut down in the first round of cost cutting measures (around the time Google became Alphabet).

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      They don’t have a monopoly like any of their competition that will easily sustain them.

      Erm, you think Bing is a serious competitor? Aside from search (91.54% of the global search market), Google is part of an ads duopoly that is only stalled by walled gardens like Amazon, TikTok, Wal*Mart, and the various entertainment companies. There’s also Google Maps, used by 77% of users between 16 and 64, and their biggest non-iOS competitor is Waze, which Google also owns. For email, 75% of the US email market is dominated by Gmail. As for the user-generated media market, YouTube absolutely dominates that. The closest competitor (Twitch, A.K.A. Amazon) is far behind.

      As for what Google engineers do, it’s mostly not rip-things-up-and-start-over innovation since these are all very mature markets with billions of users. Instead it’s small tweaks that generate hundreds of millions in savings or additional revenue.

      • pixelscript@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Supposedly a deeply unprofitable one. Which is a huge chunk of why no real competition has surfaced.

        It’s one thing to set up a proverbial store with prices so low you choke out the competition. It’s another thing to essentially pay your customers to come in, either by literally paying them or by providing a service that they pay below actual cost for.

        • bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Supposedly a deeply unprofitable one.

          That’s probably why it’s getting enshittified so quickly.

          • Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            Everything is replaceable if people want to. The problem is the inertia it takes to substitute it

            • lud@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              YouTube is really hard to replace without the money of a multi billion company.

              Video is hard and attracting creators is even harder.

              • Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                10 months ago

                So is a good search engine. As much as I love DuckDuckGo and daily drive it the results are much worse than google’s

                • lud@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  No, you can switch to a different search engine right now and the results will be perfectly fine. I use DDG exclusively.

                  What video platform can you switch to that has even remotely close to the amount of content as YouTube? (Pornhub doesn’t count)

                • bramblepatchmystery@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  The only benefit I get from google over ecosia or duckduckgo is I can’t call a company or view their menu immediately from the search page after looking them up.

        • narp@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Copilot/Bing Search might put a big dent in that in the future. People will just ask an AI instead of “googling”.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Google just confirmed to The Verge that it’s eliminated “a few hundred” roles in each of these divisions, meaning Google has confirmed layoffs of around a thousand employees on Wednesday alone, if we use a reasonable definition of “few”.

    We asked Google spokesperson Courtenay Mencini to say if this was the complete and total number of job cuts in this round of layoffs, but she stopped replying at that point, only confirming existing layoff reports at 9to5Google and Semafor.

    The New York Times reported on the engineering team layoffs too.

    When we spoke to Mencini earlier this evening about the Google hardware layoffs, she did not mention the other layoffs — but did write that “a number of our teams made changes to become more efficient and work better” and that “some teams are continuing to make these kinds of organizational changes, which include some role eliminations globally.”

    If so, though, it won’t work: The Verge is among the news outlets that takes a hard line against planted information, and we pride ourselves on finding the bigger picture.

    Parent firm Alphabet employed 182,381 employees as of September 30th, 2023, so roughly a thousand job cuts would only be around half a percent of the company’s total.


    The original article contains 360 words, the summary contains 206 words. Saved 43%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!