• kandoh@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    We live in a world where people think Biden banned abortion because it happened while he was president. What happens when those people start seeing and hearing AI recordings telling them the worst wacko shit you can possibly imagine?

    • Critical_Insight@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Asbestos and holes in the o-zone layer were real issues though and both have now been more or less resolved. It’s not like new problems mean the previous ones weren’t valid.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    LONDON (AP) — False and misleading information supercharged with cutting-edge artificial intelligence that threatens to erode democracy and polarize society is the top immediate risk to the global economy, the World Economic Forum said in a report Wednesday.

    The report listed misinformation and disinformation as the most severe risk over the next two years, highlighting how rapid advances in technology also are creating new problems or making existing ones worse.

    The authors worry that the boom in generative AI chatbots like ChatGPT means that creating sophisticated synthetic content that can be used to manipulate groups of people won’t be limited any longer to those with specialized skills.

    AI-powered misinformation and disinformation is emerging as a risk just as a billions of people in a slew of countries, including large economies like the United States, Britain, Indonesia, India, Mexico, and Pakistan, are set to head to the polls this year and next, the report said.

    Fake information also could be used to fuel questions about the legitimacy of elected governments, “which means that democratic processes could be eroded, and it would also drive societal polarization even further,” Klint said.

    1 threat, followed by four other environmental-related risks: critical change to Earth systems; biodiversity loss and ecosystem collapse; and natural resource shortages.


    The original article contains 523 words, the summary contains 210 words. Saved 60%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • arymandias@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Sometimes I wonder if the clown music is just in my head or if it’s the theme music for the past few years.

    The biggest misinformation comes from Fox or related ventures in other countries. No AI or deepfakes needed, just classical oligarchic propaganda. But yeah let’s listen to the guys willing to let the world burn for slightly higher profit margins what the big problems in the world are today.

    • Drahcir_Rekattih@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      The issue is that I know that Fox has a bias, however AI pulls on this misinformation and remixes it which makes it harder to know if it is true or not. Add to the amount of AI generated garbage on the internet good information is getting harder for your average person to find. So you may have correctly identified a major source of the misinformation, AI masking the source disseminates it far and wide.

      • arymandias@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Let’s say the New York Times publishes multiple articles and opinion pieces stating that a certain country in the middle east has weapons of mass destruction, and following this in a period 20 years a million people die a violent death in said country. Would you blame this on the printing press, on the people delivering the newspapers, on the word processing software used to write these articles, or on the people willingly pushing lies. The same goes for climate change misinformation or smoking health effects misinformation (and many more examples).

        Capital has interests and is willing to go quite far pushing them, the tools they use change but the methods and the culprits stay the same.