• Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    I literally daily drive a laptop with a 4c/8t processor (6700-HQ) so I’m not sure what you’re talking about other than perhaps the lower end i5s

    Edit to add, my other laptop with a third gen i5 is getting pretty long in the tooth though, so I wouldn’t go out of my way for something that old though

    • kurcatovium@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      I mean mainstream processors of that age. Even regular i7s of 7th gen were just dual cores with HT.

      • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        I was very confused by your comment so I took a poke around Intel ark. I see what you mean now, most mobile processors for 4th and 6th gen (probably the most common generations for used PCs that are incompatible with 11) have 2c/4t on the U series processors, but looks like any HQ processor gets a full 4 cores and if it’s an i7 it gets hyper threading, putting them closer to parity with their desktop counterparts

        • kurcatovium@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          28 days ago

          Yep, I meant U series, which (at least where I live) were covering vast majority of the market. There was occasional HQ here and there, but not that often. AMDs offerings at the time were mediocre and nobody really used them so for me, that era basically overlaps with Intel U series hegemony when speaking about laptop cpus.