• WindyRebel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      I don’t use Linux either, but a quick bit of research tells me it’s like an App Store and software that is specific to Linux. It allows for ease of installing/uninstalling programs but it can can run slow, seems redundant to what flatpaks already does, and isn’t fully fleshed out which leads to weird errors.

      I’m guessing it’s because Linux is more hands on and this takes some agency away from users who feel like it might hurt privacy?

      That’s what I’m reading anyway. Someone who is more familiar can correct me if I am off base.

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 hours ago

        The issues are twofold: Linux distros historically update software through a package manager. Something that was working fine for everyone, however it was causing a lot of work for maintainers. They got together and designed a packaging format for software that works across all Linux distributions called ‘flatpak’. However, Ubuntu decided to create an alternative called Snap, which solves the same problem, except it’s not used by anyone else.

        Also, there’s some implementation details that make it look messy in your system (every application is mounted as it’s own filesystem, so if you use tools to list your disk’s there’s a bunch of weird spammy looking drives and things like that).

        • realharo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          37 minutes ago

          Native package managers were not “working fine for everyone”, the software and libraries in them are often very outdated and contain custom patches that don’t come from the original software authors.

          So you often end up dealing with bugs that were already fixed and the fixes released months ago.

        • WindyRebel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Awesome! Thank you for this explanation. So it’s mostly just because it’s a redundancy and specific to a certain distro (Ubuntu in this case)?

          • NebLem@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            42 minutes ago

            Specific to Ubuntu, not very open for collaboration, and operated by the company who owns the Ubuntu trademarks. Additionally they’ve made it unnecessarily difficult to install non-snap versions of many popular packages. (they removed non-snap versions from upstream Debian repositories).

  • SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Until it’s wings “Snaps”.

    Ubuntu does so much good, this is one thing I wish they would abandon.

    Or at minimum, not have it as the default option.

  • 4shtonButcher@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 hours ago

    My daily driver was 6.06 up to 8.x I think. Only had minor encounters with it since. And here I am still fooling myself into thinking „I’m pretty familiar with Ubuntu“ 😅

  • flemtone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Tried both Ubuntu 24.10 and Kubuntu 24.10 and original flavour ubuntu lost to both kubuntu’s performance and customizability.

    • Billiam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The fact that Ubuntu is derived from Debian logically means it wasn’t the first Linux-based OS.

        • vzq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 hours ago

          This is gonna blow your mind. There this thing called the internet, and people put loads of information on it. You can access this using “websites” called “search engines” that index all the content.

    • breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 hours ago

      According to this, the first was Boot-Root from Torvalds himself in 1991. The oldest that are still around are Slackware (July 1993) and Debian (Aug 1993).

        • fubo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 hours ago

          SLS and Yggdrasil came out in '92; Slackware in '93; Red Hat in '95.

          The Debian project started in '93, but the first stable release wasn’t until '96, along with Linux kernel version 2.0.

          Ubuntu didn’t come along until 2004.

  • thepineapplejumped@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Been using it as my daily driver for the last couple of years and I am very happy with it.

    When there are issues they are solvable, and the options for getting software, via apt, snap, flatpak, etc. Means that I can really pick and choose how I use my machine.

    Even gaming is so much better than it used to be. A lot of things just work.

    Very happy with it, and the latest update was quite a nice little refresh of the UI.

    • jabathekek@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 hours ago

      My absolute favourite part of the update is being able to save things to “Starred” files directly from the download window. I didn’t realize how much it bothered me.