• cryptosporidium140@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    167
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The people who started HP would probably be outraged to see what they’ve become. I know their original business still exists as several spinoffs, but it’s sad that the ones who kept the stock ticker symbol were the ones in the corner eating paste

      • dan1101@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        1 year ago

        HP was indeed affordable and good. They made good laptops and laser printers for many years.

      • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        I remember Carly Fiorina getting hired and almost immediately things started turning to shit.

        • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t know, it often seems that the prior ceo (often with the help of the board) sets a company up for quick profits, but long term doom. Then he leaves and they miraculously hit their first female CEO (see GM, Yahoo, Reddit, Blizzard, Twitter (currently)).

          • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t disagree with that, but she knew exactly what she was brought in to do and jumped in with both feet. Would it have been someone else if she turned the gig down? Of course. But she said yes so it was her.

      • Godort@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        HP is still plenty serviceable as long as you’re getting HP Enterprise. The consumer stuff has been trash for almost 20 years now.

      • egeres@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Actually, they are still ahead of the competition in industrial printing, their indigo and pagewide web presses are very good and reliable, but of course those products belongs to a whole different market segment

      • no banana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Running Linux on a HP Victus desktop. The hardware is fine (I got it at a good price when my last home built PC crapped out and graphics cards were overpriced - it was simply the best deal at the time)… Bloat. Bloat everywhere in windows.

    • pfjarschel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      As someone who works extensively with the spin offs instruments, I can safely say that they would be just as outraged. They are all bad quality, fail VERY frequently, and, guess what, you have to subscribe to be able to use all the features of the hardware you bought.

        • thefartographer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I still can’t believe his cartoon got cancelled due to reverse racism… No, seriously, I can NOT believe that he actually says that shit.

          Edit to add: I’m so confused to see people agree with me in their replies but also obviously downvote me. Maybe they didn’t make it past the first sentence? Oh well, I’ve really been appreciating the discussions I’m reading!

          • thantik@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            24
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I can’t stand that term. “Reverse Racism” implies that Racism is supposed to go a specific direction. Anyone who uses it is Racist themselves.

            It’s just Racism. Like “de-evolution”. It’s just evolution numb-nuts!

            • null@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’ve never thought about it but you’re right, anyone using that term is immediately telling on themselves.

            • cryptosporidium140@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’ve always understood it to mean racism as a response to racism, like fighting fire with fire. You’re not alone in your interpretation though, which is why it’s such an unpopular term

              • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                That would be anti

                The term “reverse racism” has been around for decades, a mis-application (sometimes intentional) to imply racism is automatically one way.

                • cryptosporidium140@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Would it though? People use the term anti-racist to mean they’re against racism. How could you be racist and anti-racist at the same time?

                  People say reverse racism to call out the tactic of using racism to justify racism the other way. It’s similar to the idea of hating everyone on the planet because a few people were mean to you.