And you would be correct, because why would anyone red past a title so full of BS?
Google didn’t perfect the web, anything but. If it’s a hyperbolic title, we’ll then it fails to get me to click because it’s not interesting: I already know Google didn’t perfect the web, so I doubt the author has anything I’d care to read.
Now, if it said “How Google Fucked the Web”, I may click.
Thing is, I knew from the first year of Google how they were going to fuck the web, simply by being so much better at search, everyone would default to them, which is a bad thing.
Good article, but expect down votes from people who did not read the title. If you feel like changing it, I think Lemmy lets you.
yeah, it’s already happening. shame as it’s such a well written (and designed) article.
With a stupid title.
So I’ll never know how good it is. Not worth my click.
I think you mean read “past” the title.
And you would be correct, because why would anyone red past a title so full of BS?
Google didn’t perfect the web, anything but. If it’s a hyperbolic title, we’ll then it fails to get me to click because it’s not interesting: I already know Google didn’t perfect the web, so I doubt the author has anything I’d care to read.
Now, if it said “How Google Fucked the Web”, I may click.
Thing is, I knew from the first year of Google how they were going to fuck the web, simply by being so much better at search, everyone would default to them, which is a bad thing.