I suspect that this is the direct result of AI generated content just overwhelming any real content.

I tried ddg, google, bing, quant, and none of them really help me find information I want these days.

Perplexity seems to work but I don’t like the idea of AI giving me “facts” since they are mostly based on other AI posts

ETA: someone suggested SearXNG and after using it a bit it seems to be much better compared to ddg and the rest.

  • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    they overengineered it. they now give you results they think most people want instead of what you searched. for google, it helps to switch on verbatim mode and set your country to something weird like Azerbaijan

  • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    SEO spam has been a problem for a long time, but AI has allowed it to be accelerated to a whole new level.

      • LedgeDrop@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        I think OP is referring to the fact that bad actors, who are exploiting facets of SEO (rather then providing “meaningful” content), use to need to programically generate content (pre-AI/LLM).

        For a real reader, it was obvious (at a quick glance) this was meaningless garbage. As they would often be large walls of text that didn’t make sense, or just lists of random key words.

        With LLM/AI, they’re still walls of text and random key words, but now they grammatically/structurally correct and require no real effort to generate. Unfortunately, it means that the reader actually need to invest time in reading it. You’ll also notice a growing trend in articles (especially in “compare X vs Y” type articles), the same content is recycled and rephrased to “pad” the article and give it a higher SEO ranking.

    • Hasherm0n@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Lately I google for someone that should give me a direct, exact result. First five links are fucking paid ads.

  • Doorbook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I feel it is intentional. They are god damn good at hearing my talking about a baby and shoving all baby videos and social media post in every corner for ad revenue; yet when I search about something trivial I cannot get an answer.

    Even AI becoming useless the last couple of weeks compare to a few months back where it gave details answers.

    • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      I don’t even want a baby, but I was getting nonstop diaper ads for weeks this summer.

      I think it’s because they’re desperately trying to get people to have kids(thats my hypothesis anyway). Not saying yours isn’t picking up you talking about the topic, but I got so swamped with them at one point I was starting to wonder if I was losing my mind. I asked my husband about it and he was getting them too.

      It was honestly weird as hell.

      • sandbox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        The chance that Google, for some reason, wants people to have babies, is significantly lower than the chance you just happen to fit some demographics cohort which is likely to have a baby, or to soon have a baby.

        • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          I don’t know, it was really super weird how randomly it started shoving them in my face when it didn’t previously.

          I don’t think Google gives a shit if I have kids, but the republican party has voiced concerns over “the domestic supply of babies” multiple times over the years and I wouldn’t put it past them to give google “gratuities” to shove baby related ads on people in general, not just me specifically.

          It’s just a hypothesis I have about the sudden increase in baby related stuff. I’m not dedicated to the idea or anything, but it honestly wouldn’t surprise me if that was the case.

  • thefartographer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I asked Google why search engines are so bad now and its AI summaries its own deficiencies quite well:

    Some say search engines have declined in quality due to a number of factors, including:

    Search engine optimization (SEO) spam A wave of SEO spam has contributed to the decline in search result quality.

    Affiliate marketing Affiliate link sites contribute to the low-quality content that floods the internet.

    AI-generated content New technology can quickly produce low-quality content.

    Marketing Search results are filled with marketing and links that may not be relevant to the query.

    Recommender algorithms Some say the algorithm that recommends content is a mess. For example, someone might be recommended alt-right content after watching a click-bait video.

    Ads Google’s biggest business is advertising, and it’s inserting more ads into its products to make more money.

    Some say it’s harder to find specific information these days, and that search operators are often needed to filter search results.

  • anttifantti@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I feel like it’s especially bad if you are searching for anything related to a marketable product. I tried searching ddg for information about using a surge protector with halogen bulbs and all I got was pages and pages of listicles on “best halogen lights 2024” full of affiliate links.

    • darreninthenet@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Another vote for Kagi here as well… except for searching for local businesses near where I live, I revert to Google for that, but I Google through Kagi so privacy is somewhat protected

    • sumguyonline@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Thank you. I needed this. The “free” search engines have tainted my experience of this world. Frankly, I hate it here. I’m ready for the inevitable “Apocalypse”/" Alien invasion" that stops the absolute incompetence that permeates our society. Whether you understand it or not, I beseach upon you my blessings, may your days provide success in your endeavores, and bountiful returns to your entire home. Bless you for sharing.

  • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s not just you. At some point, search’s primary purpose went from “finding the information you’re looking for” to “getting paid to put links in front of you”. Then they kept iterating on it, quarter by quarter, for a very long time.

  • Hannes@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’m very happy with kagi at the moment. Just crossed one year using it as my main search engine last week and don’t see why I would go back.

    • MTK@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Having to signup and login to a search engines sounds like an annoying hassle

      • Hannes@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        You can create a search-link that includes your token so you can also use it in incognito or if you are logged out for some reason.

      • uzay@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        It is. And it’s also terrible for privacy, but people do it with google as well.

      • WalrusDragonOnABike [they/them]@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Signing up and logging in isn’t a problem imo. I wouldn’t even mind if I had to pay for searches, but I’m not going to make it a subscription service. Unless they add an option to do something like buy 1000 searches that never expire, its not something I’d considered. I do think they beat out competitors like google with their results pretty consistently though based on the trial.

        • Dave@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’m not gonna subscription my heated car seats but search is a service that costs an ongoing amount to provide. The subscription isn’t significant, it’s $5 a month for 300 searches (or $10 for unlimited).

          I know we’ve been conditioned to expect search for free, but if we want to get away from the “the user is the product” model then I think it’s a good thing to have a subscription to a service that has ongoing costs to provide.

      • Dave@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        You pay instead of seeing ads, so they need the account. Remembers you, though, so you just login once. Plus they have a solution for incognito/private windows too.

        I really like it, has some cool features.

      • aMockTie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s a very minor annoyance and well worth it in my opinion.

        I was searching for a book quote for over a year. I tried every search engine, tried changing the terms, checking back several times every few weeks or so, but couldn’t find anything even close. I tried kagi and it was literally the very first result on my very first search.

        I haven’t looked back and have never had an issue finding what I’m searching for since.

    • Nite@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Same. Using Kagi feels like surfing the old web. The first thing I did was block all Pinterest results. That alone made every search golden. 😂

      • Dave@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        You’re not the only one. They have a leaderboard and the top 7 results are various Pinterest domains.

      • ownsauce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        I hate Pinterest lol, best thing about Kagi is being able to block whole sites and it remembers your preferences. I may come back to Kagi but I didn’t feel like funding their AI features development. Now Im using Searx and 4get cause they’re free.

    • illi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      I don’t remember any specifics, but I think I heard there were some privacy concerns?

      Then again, there seem to be privacy concerns about pretty much anything so might not be that bad…

        • illi@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          It was not even the emails. I tried to duckgo it and only found this controversy (which was new to me). What I saw was a specific qute, possibly on topic of privacy or something adjecent which just made me go “nope!”

        • Zeoic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          If i remember right, it wasn’t just using brave, but including a referral id in brave searches. It wasn’t intended, and they fixed it, so all good with me.

      • gpopides@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        The concerns are about the credit card you use to pay.

        The argument is that they can associate the card with your searches.

        As far as I know they don’t keep search data. I’m personally happy with them

        • robber@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          That’s what’s kept me from using it, although I very much like the idea of paying for a good service. I would love to see them figure out a way to avoid accounts.

        • illi@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          I think this might be it. There were also some statements by the CEO I think which didn’t exactly inspire confidencenin their company - but again, I don’t remember the details unfortunately

    • kill_dash_nine@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Is it really $108/year good though for a single person (based on the tier that makes sense for me)? Just curious what other search engines you’ve used or tried and what features set it apart to make it worth spending the money on.

      • aMockTie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        That really depends on your use case and how valuable web search is for your daily life.

        I’ve personally tried Google, Bing, DDG, Brave search, and ChatGPT. Kagi is consistently able to find what I’m searching for more quickly and accurately than anything else, which has been very valuable for me in my personal and professional life.

        It’s easily worth the cost in result quality and time saving for me personally, but that doesn’t mean the same will apply to you or anyone else.

        As far as stand out features, there aren’t really any that I can think of. It just gives me the results I’m looking for without any bullshit to wade through.

      • Hannes@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s the first one I’ve paid for. And it is that much better than the free ones I used before imho.

  • zante@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Not just you.

    DDG has deteriorated to absolute nonsense, I’ve used it for years and years.

    Recently gave startpage another go - maybe marginally better but still really poor

    • Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      I switched to DDG right after Google added the ai answers to search and in baffled by how fast DDG seemed to go down hill. Just a few months ago it was still giving me on point results on the first try, now it almost feels like I’m using one of those malware search bars from back in the day.

    • toddestan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      DDG has also really gone downhill for me. It’s still noticeably better than Google, but DDG nows does a lot of the same shit that originally made me give up on Google years ago. I’m assuming a big part of this is because DDG heavily sources their results from Bing, and while Bing does manage to be better than Google, it’s not much better.

      I really need to put some effort into trying out a few more search engines and seeing if they are any better. Last time I looked, many of them were also pulling results from Bing so they all had similar issues.