Well, this just got darker.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      bro we got literal pedophiles roaming the streets… catholic church, other “churches”, hollywood and youtube “influencers” all have known pedophiles WHO NOT BEING PROSECUTED FOR THE CRIMES THEY ALREADY COMMITTED

      But you want state resources wasted what is essentially a thought crime or because “they might be pedophiles”?

      🤡

      Idiots can’t even properly ID the threat… no wonder country is going down the drain.

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yes, clinton and trump both flew on Esptain plane… nothing was done.

          Ruling class and their regime whores seem to get away with whatever but we got normies wanting FEDS to investigate chat logs of incels to “save the kids, just in case”

      • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        no sex crimes should be investigated until the Catholic Church and Hollywood have been purged of pedophiles

        Well, that’s certainly an opinion.

            • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Are you defending the people who used the AI bots as described?

              🤡

              No, I am telling you it is not a crime… learn to read and stop making shit up.

              If you care about sex crimes against children, there are plenty of that happening within your community, tough internet guy…

              • otp@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Lmao…if you don’t see how going “Hey it’s not actually a crime!” sounds like defending them, I can’t help you.

                And “internet tough guy”? Where is that even coming from? Lol

                • bastion@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  What was that old adage: “i may not hold the opinion you do, but I will defend your right to hold that opinion.”

                  I suppose my view on it is similar:

                  If you believe that a psychological stance should be punished physically, it might behoove you to realize that you are only permitted to hold that opinion by the good graces of those who, rightly, stand ready to destroy you if you try to enforce that view physically.

          • deviants@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            That’s a curious new benchmark for posting comments and opinions on this subject. You can only do so if you also have case files and evidence to forward to local prosecutors and police of crimes in your area.

            • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              For that reason, yeah, they probably deserve having a quick review of their life to make sure that’s the only poor choice they’ve made in regards to that particular fantasy.

              my comment addressed this idiotic statement…