• aeronmelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I think a large part of it is how most of the machines that could run 7 can run everything after 7 (maybe just need more RAM), but many many MANY machines running XP couldn’t move forward because the CPU or the integrated graphics just couldn’t take it.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      And XP was 32 bit only, it was really an updated version of Win2k, which was really rock solid.

      Which kind of supports your point.

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      My hard drive couldn’t take all the background shit in 10, it would literally stutter scanning my files. When I tried to disable the anti-virus and it told me “I’m sorry, Dave. I’m afraid I can’t do that”

      • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’m not trying to judge, but you installed and ran a modern operating system on a spinning platter drive?

        I had to switch to SSDs in 2016 because macOS was dragging hard on a Pro notebook.