I remember reading somewhere (probably my high school textbook) that one of the reasons people don’t like wind power being built is they cause visual pollution.

In my opinion, I think it would be pretty cool to just look out my window and see a giant windmill there, the opposite of visual pollution.

  • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    “Visual pollution” is a bullshit term that rich people came up with to keep them from being built near their vacation resorts. It means “ugly”

  • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    They look better than smoke stacks

    And in all honesty they remind me of like a leisurely creek or small waterfall in that they kinda just keep going on in a pleasant consistent kind of way ya know?

    Basically what I’m saying is that they’re pretty IMO

  • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I find them comforting in a reassuring, kinda awe inspiring way. Like, they’re a visual sign of at least trying to address climate change, and there’s something about having a giant, obviously artificial moving structure towering over the landscape that just gives me a sense of thrill and wonder that we are capable of building that. Those things are pretty massive if you get anywhere close to one, after all.

  • Mars2k21@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    They look fine to me. Same as windmills creating a certain aesthetic in the places they are built.

    It’s much better than having a giant power plant blocking the view of the landscape.

  • HububBub@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    No, I like the rhythmic visual quality. And on a conscious level they make me feel happy about clean electricity. I see windmills every single day and they do not get old for me.

  • Kache@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    It’s difficult to consider them pollution even if we were to accept the subjective opinion on displeasing aesthetics.

    The pollution we’re all concerned about tends to be:

    • Physically harmful
    • Difficult to confine/localize/avoid/reverse
    • An externality the economy doesn’t sufficiently account for
    • A burden that’s unevenly/unfairly distributed across society

    Even light pollution, which is arguably barely physically harmful, has all of the remaining qualities (or nearly) for sure.

    If these qualities even apply wind generators at all, they do so very weakly. They can be moved/unbuilt, the “free market” is pricing them cheaper by the day, and if you really don’t like looking at them, it’s not impractical to avoid them.

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Like with anything, too much of it will look/taste/smell/sound bad.

    Is that a reason in and of itself to not build wind power plants? No.

    Personally I find wind power plants to look cool, a bit sci-fi and futuristic.

    The argument that they are ugly is dumb, using a term like “visual pollution” is just a way to try and make a subjective oppinion sound like objective fact.

  • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Dude. They’re so fucking cool. I wish I had a wind turbine in my backyard or something. A feat of engineering I tell you.

  • vin@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I love looking at hill ranges covered in wind turbines. The swiss disagree though.