GEICO, the second-largest vehicle insurance underwriter in the US, has decided it will no longer cover Tesla Cybertrucks. The company is terminating current Cybertruck policies and says the truck “doesn’t meet our underwriting guidelines.”

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Class action lawsuits are gonna be a mother fucker

      Part of the purchase agreement of a Tesla agreeing to binding arbitration. This means no class action suit. You can opt out of this within the first 30 days, but you have to send a letter requesting it.

      How many Tesla owners do you think do that?

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Steam recently removed their arbitration clause, largely because paying for a thousand arbitration cases is worse than dealing with a class action.

        • locuester@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’ve heard that death by 1,000 arbitrations is a good way to make em regret it. Glad to see it’s true.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        That assumes the court finds that enforceable. Usually they do, but a few times recently, they’ve said it’s not.

        • Lets_Eat_Grandma@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I mean in trumps court of law musk can’t lose.

          If dumpy wins, for sure no class action.

          If dumpy loses, his Supreme Court will still side with the conservative side anyway, so probably still no class action.

        • gramie@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          That’s one of the nice things about the law in Quebec. Binding arbitration clauses are illegal.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Wow, I never thought I’d find an actual good argument for keeping independent car dealers as middlemen instead of allowing first-party sales, but here we are.

        • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Can you connect the dots for me? Third party dealers always have idemnity? clauses anyways.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Presumably anything you’d agree to while buying from an independent dealer would be between you and the dealer, not you and the manufacturer, right? I don’t understand how the manufacturer would be a party to the transaction.

            (It might be that I’m naive about how modern car sales work.)

            • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              I’m pretty clueless too, but to me your assertion doesn’t hold up to the concept of recalls.

              The true answer is probably that we’re both wrong and the answer is that as a consumer: you lose, fuck you. Also fuck your family dog.