I saw this post and wanted to ask the opposite. What are some items that really aren’t worth paying the expensive version for? Preferably more extreme or unexpected examples.

    • Admetus@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Aspirin and paracetamol I don’t think are patented by any one company now. Supermarket brand is super cheap.

    • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Also, a cheaper alternative is to eat less and eat healthier. I know we can’t all afford expensive healthy foods but just simply cutting out excess fats, sugar and empty carbs from your diet will add years to your life and also add better years to your life.

    • cerpa@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Not exactly. Just a fun fact and disclaimer that I use generics if at all possible. But my pharmacology class taught that generics can have higher tolerance of error in % of active ingredient. Not usually a big deal unless the drug has a very narrow therapeutic range, meaning too little doesn’t work and too much will harm you. 99.9% of generics is fine. But if you ever wonder if one batch of your med doesn’t seem to work as well this it’s likely that batch was on the lower end of acceptable.

    • Shadow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      But real Advil has the candy coating on the outside, and I haven’t found a generic that does =(

      Otherwise 100% identical yes.

      • Johandea@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Wait, what? I have no idea what advil is, but sugar coating any drug is a recipe for disaster.

        • chaorace@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Sugarcoating pills is fairly common, especially for pills which are frequently ingested or target older demographics. It’s because sugar coatings are much gentler on the esophagus (i.e.: less likely to cause esophagitis, “pill burn”). Advil (i.e.: ibuprofen) is a cheap, well tolerated, and non habit-forming pain reliever – it’s about as safe as such a thing could possibly be, so hopefully that helps to explain why a sugar coating might be warranted given the aforementioned upsides (for the love of all that is holy; always read the directions on the label, it’s still quite possible that Advil is not safe for you specifically). FWIW: the bottles also have childproofing mechanisms built into the caps (… at least in U.S. markets. Not sure about elsewhere?)

            • Norgur@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              I think you have a wrong image of how this looks/works. It’s not like there is a cany-shell or something. It’s a regular, smooth pill. You usually do not notice this coating because you don’t keep a pill in your mouth. If you were to, the pill would taste sweet.

              If you ever have gotten a pill of some sort that dd not feel chalky on the outside but smooth and looked kinda shiny, that probably has been a sugarcoated pill.

      • ivanafterall@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Problem with the candy coating is you can’t enjoy it, unless you want to suddenly learn what pure poison tastes like. It’s such a tease. Doesn’t help that they look like scrumptious little caramel-y morsels.

      • Otter@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yep

        There may be a difference in things like pill shape, texture, release mechanism / time to absorb (if it’s not very important for how the medication works)

        So it’s ok to have a preference for one brand over the other when one of those points is relevant to your situation. I know some people also prefer the generic brand version over the regular (even if prices were the same)

      • Raptor_007@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        A few years ago, I wondered why that was and googled it. I came to an Advil site with an expandable FAQ, and one of the questions was “why does Advil taste sweet?”

        So I expanded it out to reveal this shocking answer (or something similar): “Advil tastes sweet because it is lightly coated in sugar.”

        Thanks, I guess. I just closed the tab in mild irritation and moved on with my day.

    • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Depends on the meds. I take concerta for ADHD and as I understand it, the generic doesn’t use the same release mechanism.

      • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m also on concerta (ADHD highfive) and I’ve found lower efficacy with the generic… I sure wish it was the same though.